Critics’ reviews

The Last Seduction (1994)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 77: 7 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Last Seduction

77
Positive
7
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to The Last Seduction, with praise concentrated on Linda Fiorentino’s performance as Bridget. The reviews repeatedly single out her ruthlessness, humour and command of an amoral character. John Dahl’s feel for film noir also earns approval, while the screenplay attracts praise for its wit, sharp dialogue and cleverly arranged surprises. The broad agreement is that the film makes its hard-boiled material entertaining through both performance and plotting.

The main reservation concerns how far that plotting stretches credibility: the Los Angeles Times finds the film audacious and entertaining but questions its plausibility. The spread is broadly favourable rather than sharply divided, with seven positive assessments, one mixed and none negative. There is little evidence of a substantial dissenting camp, although incomplete access to some reviews limits what can be said about their reservations.

Empire
12 June 1998 · Kim Newman
90*

Newman calls it John Dahl’s best film to date, praising its surprising plot twists and strong performances. He especially singles out Linda Fiorentino’s funny, cynically rendered performance as Bridget.

Read the full review →
The Independent
7 August 1994 · Lesley Thornton
85*

The critic finds the film a compelling, witty update of film noir. She particularly praises Linda Fiorentino’s riveting performance and the strength of the screenplay.

Read the full review →
Variety
23 February 1994 · festival review · David Stratton
85*

Stratton praises the film as a polished, cleverly plotted thriller with a compellingly amoral lead. He singles out Linda Fiorentino’s performance as the ruthless Bridget for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
30 October 1994 · Anthony Lane
75*

Lane gives the film a positive verdict, calling Linda Fiorentino’s performance a star turn. He also praises its hard-boiled film-noir style and John Dahl’s affinity for the genre.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
26 October 1994 · Kenneth Turan
70*

Turan finds the film entertaining and audacious despite a plot that strains plausibility. He especially praises Linda Fiorentino’s venomous performance and John Dahl’s feel for film noir.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 October 1994 · Janet Maslin
70*

The headline suggests a positive verdict, presenting the film’s femme fatale as convincing. The accessible page provides no further detail about what the critic praised.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
· Roger Ebert
64*

The page appears to be a review of the specified film, but its text is inaccessible. I cannot determine the critic’s verdict or what the review singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
18 October 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
75*

The critic finds the thriller highly successful at what it sets out to do. They praise its raw-edged dialogue and Linda Fiorentino’s wide-ranging performance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate