Critics’ reviews

The Man from U.N.C.L.E. (2015)

24 reviews from 24 publications. Critics’ score 55: 8 positive, 9 mixed, 7 negative.

Back to our review of The Man from U.N.C.L.E.

55
Positive
8
Mixed
9
Negative
7
Vulture
14 August 2015 · David Edelstein
90*

Edelstein finds the film absolutely delightful, praising its breezy, elegant style and playful choreography. He especially singles out Guy Ritchie’s carefully arranged action and visual comedy, while noting that the story is formulaic and emotionally slight.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 July 2024 · ★★★★ · Kenji Fujishima
80

Fujishima finds the film pointless but breezy and engaging. He praises its stylish, comic action, especially Solo’s detached perspective during the motorboat chase.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
13 August 2015 · B · Jesse Hassenger
77

Hassenger finds the film entertaining and stylish, though its plot and late action sequence weaken the experience. He praises the playful characterization and visual details, especially the actors’ performances and comic offscreen action.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 August 2014 · Helen O'Hara
70*

The review finds the film funny and stylish, though its plot and action do not always sustain its charm. It especially praises the chemistry between Cavill and Hammer and the bright period look.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
14 August 2015 · Guy Lodge
65*

Lodge finds the film smoothly entertaining, though its storytelling is indifferent and its plot hard to follow. He singles out the immaculate costumes and Elizabeth Debicki’s stylish villain for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
12 August 2015
64*

The available text does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It provides no specific praise or complaint to summarize.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
11 August 2015 · C+ · IndieWire Contributor
63

The critic finds the film an uneven, failed blend of comedy and espionage. They praise Cavill’s charisma and the early chase scene, but fault the muddled tone and increasingly serious action.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
13 August 2015 · 3/3/3 · David Ehrlich
60

Ehrlich finds the film stylish but lacking substance and rhythm. He praises its music, especially the score and well-chosen songs.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Andrew Collins
60

The critic gives the spy caper a three-star verdict. They single out its enjoyably hokey plot as a strength.

Read the full review →
Total Film
11 August 2015 · ★★★ · Josh Winning
60

The critic finds the film fun but messy, and says it falls short of the old-school Bond it aims to evoke. They praise its vintage period detail and charm, while noting that the central pairing never quite sparks.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
11 August 2015 · Tim Grierson
40*

The review suggests the film’s relentless coolness leaves it lacking warmth. It singles out the absence of warmth as its main complaint.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
10 August 2015 · Todd McCarthy
35*

The critic finds the film watchable but ultimately lukewarm, with its tone and central partnership never quite settling. He praises the stylish settings and colorful action, while criticizing the lead characters’ underdeveloped dynamic.

Read the full review →
Variety
11 August 2015 · Peter Debruge
35*

Debruge finds the film solidly made and stylish but ultimately forgettable, with bland leads and little chemistry. He praises its elegant visual composition and carefully realized 1960s atmosphere.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
16 August 2015 · Anthony Lane
30*

Lane is largely critical of the film, finding its shift from Cold War intrigue to silliness and its busy stylistic flourishes unconvincing. He singles out the brief moments of chemistry between Solo and Kuryakin as a glimpse of a more charming film.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
13 August 2015 · Mark Olsen
25*

Olsen finds the film hollow and unable to deliver even modest entertainment, despite its stylish surface. He singles out Elizabeth Debicki’s glamorous, committed performance as a highlight.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
11 August 2015 · Guardian staff reporter
15*

The critic finds the film stylish but deathly boring, and says it lacks the wit and excitement of comparable spy films. They single out the dull, uncharismatic male leads and the absence of chemistry among the cast.

Read the full review →
Deadline
14 August 2015 · Pete Hammond
75*

Hammond finds the film fun and stylish, with Ritchie’s direction keeping it lively. He especially praises the easygoing chemistry between Henry Cavill and Armie Hammer.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
11 August 2015 · Stella Papamichael
70*

Papamichael finds the film a lively, entertaining antidote to modern Bond’s darker tone, though its set-pieces do not match Bond’s best spectacle. She praises the playful tension and banter between Cavill and Hammer’s mismatched agents.

Read the full review →
NME
70*

The critic finds the film consistently likeable, though its style outweighs its substance. They praise its sumptuous period detail and single out Elizabeth Debicki’s scene-stealing performance.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
11 August 2015
70*

The critic finds the film an entertaining, stylish but uneven summer diversion. They praise its cast and crisp 1960s fashions, while faulting a harsh gag that clashes with the film’s tone.

Read the full review →
Consequence
14 August 2015 · Sarah Kurchak
65*

Kurchak finds the film a fun, passable spy romp, though it feels unnecessary as an U.N.C.L.E. adaptation. She praises its stylish scenery and costumes, while faulting the leads for lacking the original duo’s charisma.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
12 August 2015 · 2.5 out of 5 · Don Kaye
53*

Kaye finds the film visually delightful but ultimately inert, with little reason to support a franchise. He praises its compositions, fashions, settings, and jazzy score, while faulting the leads’ weak chemistry and the inconsequential story.

Read the full review →
Paste
15 August 2015 · 5.0/10 · Jim Hemphill
50

Hemphill finds the film visually sumptuous but ultimately boring, with a weak story and uninvolving action. He especially praises the period design and the clever silent boat-chase scene.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 August 2015 · Angus Wolfe Murray
15*

The critic finds the film humourless, overcomplicated and weighed down by its retro dialogue. They praise the reconstruction of divided Berlin and single out Armie Hammer and Alicia Vikander for strong performances.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate