Critics’ reviews

The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008)

16 reviews from 16 publications. Critics’ score 38: 1 positive, 5 mixed, 10 negative.

Back to our review of The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

38
Positive
1
Mixed
5
Negative
10

Most critics find The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor a tired sequel, with spectacle doing little to compensate for weak dialogue and performances short on enthusiasm. Praise is scattered rather than sustained: Michelle Yeoh’s presence, the Chinese cast, the locations and costumes give some reviewers something to enjoy. Even several unfavourable reviews acknowledge moments of energy or effective effects work, but the prevailing complaint is that the adventure lacks its predecessors’ fun.

The spread is wide, with disagreement over whether the absurdity entertains and whether the action is competently staged. The AV Club offers the clearest defence, enjoying the parade of outlandish creatures and Jet Li’s villain despite the mechanical plotting. Eye for Film also finds the action confident, whereas Variety considers it incoherent and poorly staged. Reservations otherwise cluster around laboured family banter, uneven effects and awkward acting; the more receptive reviews largely accept those flaws as the price of a light-hearted diversion.

The AV Club
31 July 2008 · B- · Nathan Rabin
70

Rabin finds the film mechanically plotted but entertaining as an excessive, ridiculous spectacle. He singles out its parade of outlandish elements, including yetis, undead armies, and Jet Li’s memorable villain.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
31 July 2008 · Tim Grierson
64*

This is a review of the matching film, but the review text is hidden behind a paywall. The accessible page provides no verdict or specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
1 August 2008
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint is available from the supplied page text.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
63*

The page could not be accessed, so its verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint is available from the blocked text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Sue Robinson
40

Robinson finds the sequel diminished compared with its predecessor. She singles out the loss of vigour in Brendan Fraser’s performance as a disappointment.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
1 August 2008 · Kenneth Turan
35*

Turan finds the sequel less enjoyable than its predecessors and says its spectacle cannot overcome its weak banter and uninvolved performances. He praises the epic scale and Michelle Yeoh’s commanding presence.

Read the full review →
Empire
22 March 2007 · William Thomas
30*

The critic finds the film competent but dull, lacking the memorable moments that made earlier entries fun. He singles out the clunky script and the charisma-free performance of Luke Ford as major weaknesses.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
30 July 2008 · Frank Scheck
30*

Scheck finds the sequel tired and says it makes the franchise feel finished despite its action and effects. He praises the terra cotta soldiers’ CGI, while criticizing the silly tone and awkward performances.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
30 July 2008 · ★/4 · Nick Schager
25

Schager gives the film a scathing verdict, calling it nearly unwatchable and empty-headed. He particularly condemns the chaotic action sequences, with their excessive effects, noise, and spastic camera movement.

Read the full review →
Time Out
5 August 2008 · ★ · David Jenkins
20

The critic pans this phoned-in action sequel as farcical. They complain that it makes the recent Indiana Jones film seem dramatically and archaeologically sound.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
8 August 2008 · Peter Bradshaw
10*

Bradshaw pans the film as a lifeless, money-making exercise. He singles out Maria Bello’s unconvincing accent and the poor writing and direction for John Hannah.

Read the full review →
Variety
30 July 2008 · Todd McCarthy
10*

McCarthy pans the film as stale, low-grade franchise fare and says the time has come to end the series. He singles out the incoherent, poorly staged action and weak family dialogue as major flaws.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
4 August 2008 · ★★★ · Sarah Dobbs
60

Dobbs finds the film a silly, light-hearted adventure that works as a fun pick-me-up despite its flaws. She especially praises its gorgeous locations and fantastic costumes, while lamenting the limited screen time for Jet Li and Michelle Yeoh.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
6 August 2008 · Jennie Kermode
55*

Kermode finds the film watchable but uneven, saying it falls short of the rip-roaring adventure it should be. She praises the Chinese stars and confident action set pieces, while criticizing Maria Bello’s performance and the laboured dialogue.

Read the full review →
Paste
27 August 2008 · Russ Fischer
25*

Fischer finds the film marginally better than the latest Indiana Jones, but ultimately a weak, inconsistent adventure. He praises the early setpieces’ energy while faulting the flat Jet Li–Michelle Yeoh confrontation and slapdash CGI.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
5 August 2008 · Stella Papamichael
15*

The critic finds the film lifeless, trite, and a disappointing imitation of its predecessors. Michelle Yeoh’s swordplay showdown with Jet Li is singled out as the highlight, while the effects are criticized as lacklustre.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate