Critics’ reviews

The Outpost (2020)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 70: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Outpost

70
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics come away impressed, and the praise clusters in one place: the long battle that takes up much of the second half. Review after review singles out the staging of that sequence, the point-of-view camerawork and the clear mapping of the outpost, for making the terror of the fight legible without losing the viewer. Several also credit the film with keeping the soldiers’ sacrifice, rather than any sense of victory, at the centre.

The reservations gather around everything before the shooting starts. More than one critic finds the screenplay thin on character, and some note a modest, straight-to-video look in the quieter stretches. The spread is wide at the bottom: the Los Angeles Times is the clear outlier, calling the film hollow and monotonous and faulting it for sidestepping the larger questions around the battle, while still admiring the combat photography. HeyUGuys stands slightly apart the other way, praising the performances as much as the action.

Variety
29 June 2020 · Peter Debruge
85*

Debruge finds the film an exhilarating, immersive account of the battle that honors the soldiers’ sacrifice. He especially praises its nearly hourlong finale and point-of-view camerawork for conveying the terror of combat.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
2 July 2020 · B · David Ehrlich
77

Ehrlich finds the film a steely, moving memorial and cautionary tale, despite its limited depth and occasional VOD feel. He praises the long, clearly staged combat sequence for conveying the battle’s terror while emphasizing the soldiers’ valor over victory.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
29 June 2020 · Frank Scheck
75*

Scheck finds the film a visceral, admirably crafted war drama, though its screenplay does not fully engage with its central characters. He especially praises the immersive, disorienting staging of the lengthy battle sequence.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint can be verified.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
2 July 2020 · Mark Olsen
30*

Olsen finds the film a hollow, monotonous war movie that avoids the larger questions surrounding the battle. He praises its immersive, intimate combat cinematography and clear visual mapping of the outpost.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
30 June 2020
85*

The critic finds the film gripping and ultimately triumphant, while emphasizing the terrible cost of its victory. The immersive, sustained combat sequence and the soldiers’ acts of sacrifice stand out for praise.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
· Jack Hawkins
80*

The critic calls the film a strong, defining entry in the post-9/11 war genre. They especially praise its performances and commitment to historical realism.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate