Critics’ reviews

The Pelican Brief (1993)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 61: 2 positive, 5 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Pelican Brief

61
Positive
2
Mixed
5
Negative
2

Most critics land in the middle on this one, and what warmth there is goes almost entirely to the two leads. Roberts and Washington are singled out repeatedly, even by reviewers who think little of the film around them; Turan at the Los Angeles Times, no admirer of the picture, still likes their rapport. The dense plotting and legal detail carried over from Grisham earn credit, as does the supporting cast. Variety stands alone in calling the execution close to flawless.

The reservations cluster on pace and structure. Several reviews find the plot murky and the film slow to catch fire, and Empire notes that Washington is kept off screen too long, a complaint the Guardian sharpens into a wasted part. The spread is wide, from outright enthusiasm to two dismissals, with a later home-video notice calling it plainly mediocre. The consensus is a competent, star-led thriller that few critics defend with much energy.

Variety
12 December 1993 · Brian Lowry
91*

Lowry gives the thriller an enthusiastic verdict, praising its taut, intelligent adaptation and near-flawless execution. He especially singles out Julia Roberts and Denzel Washington, whose performances anchor the film.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

Ferguson describes the film as following a formula established by earlier Grisham adaptations. He singles out its dense plotting, legal detail, charismatic leads and star-studded supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
65*

Errigo finds the adaptation solid, intelligent and entertaining, though ultimately unspectacular. She praises the casting and highlights its nail-biting set pieces, while noting structural shakiness that keeps Denzel Washington off screen too long.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
27 December 1993 · Anthony Lane
64*

Anthony Lane’s Current Cinema column reviews The Pelican Brief alongside Philadelphia. The available page does not show his verdict or what he singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 December 1993 · Janet Maslin
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. The headline frames the film as a contemporary Nancy Drew story, but the review’s specific praise or complaints are unavailable.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
64*

The accessible page provides no verdict. It does not reveal what the critic singled out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
35*

The critic finds Pakula’s adaptation lightweight and ultimately unimpressive. They criticize Washington’s wasted role while noting Roberts’s familiar startled-fawn performance.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
17 December 1993 · Kenneth Turan
30*

Turan finds the thriller a fizzle, with a murky plot and a sluggish pace that keep it from catching fire. He praises Roberts and Washington’s pleasant on-screen rapport, though he says the supporting cast gives them little help.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
16 April 2009 · 2 out of 5 · Louis Turfrey
52*

Turfrey finds the film mediocre and the Blu-ray release disappointing. He praises the clean, crisp picture transfer but criticizes the lack of extras.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate