Critics’ reviews

The Rapture (1991)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 68: 5 positive, 3 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Rapture

68
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics come down in favour of The Rapture, and nearly every review, whatever its final verdict, praises Mimi Rogers. Her performance as a bored telephone operator drawn into a fundamentalist movement is called brave, fearless and commanding by supporters and sceptics alike. Michael Tolkin, in his debut as writer-director, is credited with taking faith and divine judgement seriously without endorsing them, and the word that recurs is audacious. Variety also singles out Bojan Bazelli’s cinematography.

The reservations cluster on tone and on the ending. Several critics find the shifts in mood uneven, and more than one describes the film as caught between the profound and the pretentious, with the final stretch dividing opinion sharply: what one review calls chilling, another calls ridiculous. The spread is wide, from a full-marks review at Slant to Time Out, the lone outright dismissal, which finds the whole thing risible. The consensus is admiring but wary.

Slant Magazine
9 November 2004 · ★★★★/4 · Keith Uhlich
100

Uhlich finds the film profound and quietly rapturous, praising its treatment of Sharon’s free will amid religious and patriarchal forces. He singles out Mimi Rogers’s brave, spectacular performance and the calm, chilling delivery of the final line.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
4 October 1991 · Kenneth Turan
85*

Turan finds the film compelling, audacious, and thoughtful in its probing of faith and the afterlife. He particularly praises Mimi Rogers’s fearless performance and Michael Tolkin’s dispassionate handling of challenging theological ideas.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
15 November 2004 · Scott Tobias
80*

Tobias praises the film as an audacious, thought-provoking work that takes religious faith and divine judgment seriously without embracing them. He singles out its defiant conclusion for its provocative challenge to the idea of God's justice.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
70*

Newman finds the film’s unsettling intensity ultimately effective, though its mood shifts may not work for everyone. He particularly praises the central performance and the atmosphere of dread and wonder.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
30 September 1991
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Robert Sellers
60

Sellers describes the film as ambitious, challenging and intelligent, despite some imperfections. He especially praises Mimi Rogers’s bravura performance as a bored telephone operator drawn into a fundamentalist religious movement.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1991 · Variety Staff
50*

Variety finds the film an unexpectedly serious exploration that struggles between profundity and pretentiousness, while still marking a distinctive debut for Michael Tolkin. It praises Mimi Rogers’s commanding, soul-baring performance and Bojan Bazelli’s luminous cinematography.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· BC
30*

The critic finds the film unfortunately loony and ultimately risible. Its final stretch is singled out for becoming cherishably ridiculous.

Read the full review →
Paste
31 January 2005 · Tim Porter
75*

Porter finds the film audacious and potentially devastating, though its ideas and drama can become muddled and manipulative. He especially praises Mimi Rogers’s performance and the film’s openness to interpretation.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate