Critics’ reviews

The Thing (1982)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 73: 10 positive, 0 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Thing

73
Positive
10
Mixed
0
Negative
2
Time Out
29 November 2011 · ★★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
100

The film has emerged as one of the most potent modern terrors after initial dismissal. The critic singles out the magnificently imaginative pre-CG effects and the icy chill of suspicion and uncertainty for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
90*

The critic hails John Carpenter's 1982 film as a peerless masterpiece of relentless suspense, visual excess and nihilistic terror. The slimy effects, Ennio Morricone's score and the straight-playing ensemble cast are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
23 October 2017 · Anton Bitel
90*

The restored 1982 film has become a horror/sci-fi classic that stands the test of time. The critic singles out the extraordinarily grotesque practical effects and the mood of paranoid claustrophobia for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
30 October 2004 · Eric Henderson
70*

The film excels by emphasizing fractures in its all-male group under duress and the erosion of trust rather than just the gore. It is somewhat schematic compared to Carpenter's best work but delivers a satisfying existential finale.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
28 October 2016 · Mike D'Angelo
70*

Carpenter excels at building suspense through formal mastery and tension in scenes like the blood test, more than in the horror payoff of the creature effects. The film is a classic but contains two distinct movies, only one of which is terrific.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
11 September 2009 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

John Carpenter’s 1982 sci-fi horror is pretty scary and entertaining stuff on re-release, though nothing quite lives up to its tremendous opening sequence. The tension of the beginning is superb and the sinister dog is inspired, but things get a little broad later on while remaining watchable.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 January 1982 · Roger Ebert
30*

The critic found the film disappointing due to superficial characterizations and implausible character behavior at the outpost. It functions mainly as a gross-out effects showcase rather than a compelling story-driven horror film.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1982 · Variety Staff
30*

The monster effects are vividly gruesome and the premise is strong, but the film is a letdown overall, missing the intense dread of the original and featuring a nominal hero whose attitude undercuts his status.

Read the full review →
Paste
23 June 2022 · Jim Vorel
95*

The critic calls The Thing a masterpiece and the best horror film of 1982, praising its technical triumph through groundbreaking practical effects, careful visual storytelling, and a pervasive icy paranoia that makes the alien threat uniquely insidious. He notes its initial critical condemnation for gore and nihilism but highlights its subsequent reappraisal as a landmark of the genre.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
23 June 2022 · Miles Surrey
85*

The piece celebrates The Thing as a master class in suspense and practical effects that has achieved cult status, singling out the grotesque creature designs and the nerve-racking blood-test sequence for building unbearable paranoia. It contrasts the film's initial critical panning and box-office failure with its lasting influence and ambiguous ending.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
1 November 2008 · ★★★★ · Jeff Robson
80

The critic calls it a classic white-knuckle ride and one of the high points of Carpenter's career. They single out the practical special effects (including the memorable dog kennel scene) and the bleak, ambiguous ending amid the paranoia of flawed characters.

Read the full review →
Polygon
24 January 2026 · Debopriyaa Dutta
80*

The critic praises Carpenter's use of the Antarctic cold as a metaphor that heightens mistrust and sensory disorientation among the characters, making the blood-test scene a standout for linking environmental harshness to psychological dread. She contrasts it favorably with the 2011 prequel, noting how the original better ties the setting to themes of isolation and paranoia.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate