Critics’ reviews

The Three Musketeers (2011)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 45: 2 positive, 5 mixed, 8 negative.

Back to our review of The Three Musketeers

45
Positive
2
Mixed
5
Negative
8

Most critics come down against it: eight of the fifteen reviews are negative and only two are in favour. Where there is praise, it clusters on the costumes and production design, the Bavarian scenery and the pace of the stuntwork. The supporting cast fares best. Christoph Waltz and Freddie Fox’s eccentric King Louis are named repeatedly as the performers who bring any life to it, and several reviewers grant that it is harmless, good-natured fun for anyone willing to forget Dumas.

The complaints gather around the script and the action: a muddled, noisy plot, bland leads, with Logan Lerman’s d’Artagnan singled out, and green-screen set pieces that lack the clarity of a properly staged swordfight. The spread is wide, from outright pans to a qualified recommendation. The dissenters are Slant Magazine, which finds the 3D immersive and the action spatially coherent, and Empire, which enjoys the traditionally choreographed fencing and the rooftop duel.

Slant Magazine
21 October 2011 · ★★★/4 · Jaime N. Christley
75

Christley gives the film a qualified positive verdict, finding its awkward dialogue and opening scenes outweighed by its visual spectacle. He particularly praises Anderson’s immersive use of 3D and the film’s spatially coherent action.

Read the full review →
Empire
11 May 2010 · Dan Jolin
70*

Jolin finds the film absurd and derivative but ultimately enjoyable, lively entertainment. He especially praises the traditionally choreographed fencing and the climactic duel on the cathedral roof.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
23 September 2011 · Mark Adams
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its verdict is unavailable in the accessible text. No specific praise or complaint can be verified because the article body is paywalled.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. The review’s specific praise or complaint is also unavailable.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Karen Krizanovich
60

Krizanovich suggests the film may disappoint viewers seeking fidelity to Dumas, but says open-minded viewers can enjoy its liberties. She praises the costumes, Bavarian scenery and fast-paced stuntwork.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 October 2011 · ★★ · Nigel Floyd
40

The review describes the film as an efficient digital reworking but suggests it has little to recommend it. It singles out the adaptation’s introduction as its only notable feature, though the available description cuts off before specifying what is introduced.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 October 2011 · Peter Bradshaw
35*

Bradshaw finds the film ho-hum and messy rather than entertaining. He singles out Christoph Waltz as the one actor who adds any fizz.

Read the full review →
Variety
23 September 2011 · Leslie Felperin
35*

Felperin finds the adaptation entertaining but anodyne, lacking a distinctive hook and already feeling dated. She praises the elaborate costumes and production design, while faulting the script and the sluggish middle section.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
23 September 2011 · festival review · Rolf Konow
30*

The critic finds the swashbuckling adventure noisy but disappointing, with little freshness and a frustratingly sequel-ready ending. The elaborate period costumes stand out, while the bland lead and unimaginative use of 3D draw criticism.

Read the full review →
Total Film
11 October 2011 · ★ · Neil Smith
20

The critic pans the film as a lumbering, preposterous adaptation lacking élan and panache. He singles out the overblown action set pieces and the dull performances as key problems.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
21 October 2011 · Michael Phillips
10*

Phillips pans the film as chaotic, noisy, and careless with its source material. He especially criticizes the green-screen-heavy action, which leaves him longing for a well-paced, well-edited swordfight.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
23 September 2011 · ★★★ · Ryan Lambie
60

Lambie finds the film harmless, good-natured fun, though not a particularly great one. He praises Freddie Fox’s comic turn as King Louis and Christoph Waltz’s scenes, while criticizing Logan Lerman’s performance.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
12 October 2011 · ★★★ · Lisa Giles-Keddie
60

The critic finds the adaptation harmlessly entertaining but ultimately disappointing for fans of the Musketeers. Freddie Fox’s eccentric King Louis is singled out as a highlight, while the abundance of gadgets overshadows the Musketeers’ camaraderie.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
10 October 2011 · ★ · Ben Rawson-Jones
20

The critic pans the film as a muddled, poorly characterized adaptation with ineffective visuals. They single out Milla Jovovich’s playful performance and the airship CGI as rare bright spots.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
5 October 2011 · Donald Munro
20*

Munro finds the film a poor, derivative adaptation whose spectacle cannot make up for its weak plot and characters. He singles out the energy and costume work as its few strengths.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate