Most critics are unimpressed, and the lean is heavily negative: fifteen of the twenty-one reviews are unfavourable. Where praise lands, it lands on the wedding, which several reviewers single out as the one sequence that is elegant and properly staged, and on Bill Condon, credited by a few with giving the material a graver, creepier mood than the earlier instalments. Kristen Stewart’s work through Bella’s pregnancy is also picked out more than once as the best performance in the film.
The complaints cluster around pace and the digital wolves. Slow is the recurring word, along with bloated, funereal and slog. The CGI wolves are called distracting and uncanny, the pregnancy plot grotesque, and a handful of reviews say the film barely stands up on its own. The dissent is small but clear: The New Yorker calls it the best Twilight film so far, and HeyUGuys finds it a satisfying, more mature entry for fans. The AV Club is warm on similar terms.
The critic calls it the best Twilight film so far, praising its languorous, romantic mood and increasingly disturbing turn toward horror. Bill Condon’s grave direction is singled out for making the supernatural drama more effective.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
17 November 2011 · B- · Alison Willmore
70
Willmore calls the film an engaging, wildly over-the-top spectacle, especially for existing fans. She praises its warm human moments but criticizes the pregnancy storyline as grotesque and unconvincing.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
15 November 2011 · Brent Simon
64*
The page identifies this as a review, but its verdict is hidden behind a paywall. The accessible text does not reveal what the critic singled out for praise or complaint.
Read the full review →The URL identifies this as a New York Times review of the 2011 film. The page content was inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be determined.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
16 November 2011 · ★★★ · Anna Smith
60
The review gives the film a three-out-of-five rating. The available page text does not reveal what the critic praises or criticizes.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
17 November 2011 · ★★ · Emma Dibdin
40
The critic finds the film grim, incoherent and joyless, and says it leaves a bad taste as a love story. She praises the wedding festivities as surprisingly good fun but singles out the dull werewolf scenes as the film’s worst.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
17 November 2011 · D · Jeff Otto
37
The critic calls it the weakest entry in the franchise and says it barely works as a standalone movie. He particularly faults the wooden performances and the poor-looking wolf effects.
Read the full review →V
Variety
11 November 2011 · Justin Chang
35*
Chang finds the film disappointing overall, faulting its lack of darkness and dramatic tension despite its promising premise. He praises the wedding and honeymoon romance, especially the emotional payoff of Bella and Edward’s relationship.
Read the full review →E
Empire
22 May 2009 · Helen O'Hara
30*
O'Hara finds the film starts strongly but becomes overwrought and often ludicrous. She singles out the pregnancy storyline and weak effects as major problems, while noting the acting is better than before.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
15 November 2011 · Peter Bradshaw
30*
Bradshaw finds the film’s romantic melodrama tiresome and the franchise seemingly endless. He singles out the repetitive wolves-versus-vampires conflict and Jacob’s loyalty dilemma as especially wearisome.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
18 November 2011 · Betsy Sharkey
25*
Sharkey finds the film lifeless and disappointing, calling it broken compared with the earlier entries. She praises the wedding sequence as elegant and superbly executed, but faults the script for failing to explore the story’s dramatic potential.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
18 November 2011 · ★/4 · R. Kurt Osenlund
25
Osenlund condemns the film as a joyless, inept installment that fails to make its supposedly momentous events compelling. He especially criticizes Kristen Stewart’s performance, saying her limited mannerisms undermine Bella’s character.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
11 November 2011 · Todd McCarthy
25*
McCarthy judges the film a bloated, slow, and disappointing first half of the finale. He particularly criticizes the honeymoon scenes for withholding the emotional payoff the series had been building toward.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · The Standard
10*
The critic dismisses the film as a mortifying bore and a poor continuation of the series. They particularly fault its funereal pacing and the leads’ unconvincing performances.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
16 November 2011 · ★★★★ · Laura Hills
80
Hills finds the film a satisfying, more mature installment that should please Twilight fans despite some cringe-worthy moments and questionable CGI. She particularly praises Kristen Stewart’s performance during Bella’s pregnancy.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
15 November 2011 · ★★ · Catherine Howard
40
Howard finds the film a monotonous slog, with only occasional enjoyable moments for casual viewers. She singles out the uncanny-looking CGI wolves as a major distraction.
Read the full review →P
Paste
20 November 2011 · 3.0 · Jonathan W. Hickman
40*
Hickman calls the film bad and boring, with little lasting impression for viewers outside the franchise’s devoted fanbase. He singles out Kristen Stewart’s portrayal of Bella’s physical and emotional deterioration as the strongest performance, though the surrounding melodrama fails to convince.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
17 November 2011 · Alonso Duralde
35*
The critic finds the film’s material ludicrous and its performances blank, though Condon makes it stylish and creepy. The wedding sequence and Navarro’s lush cinematography stand out as effective craft.
Read the full review →N
NME
18 November 2011 · Owen Nicholls
30*
The critic finds the film mostly dull, though its bizarre climax makes for an unexpectedly entertaining experience. They single out the drawn-out wedding buildup as deathly boring before the shocking childbirth sequence.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
18 November 2011 · Simon Reynolds
20*
Reynolds finds the film sluggish and unsatisfying, with its dramatic build-ups repeatedly falling flat. He criticizes the awkward shifts between romance and body horror, which prevent the story from becoming a coherent whole.
Read the full review →The headline indicates a strongly negative verdict. It singles out the film as feeling barely like a complete movie.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate