Critics’ reviews

The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (2010)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 56: 6 positive, 4 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of The Twilight Saga: Eclipse

56
Positive
6
Mixed
4
Negative
5

Most critics agree that Eclipse is the best of the Twilight films so far, and several add that this is faint praise. Approval clusters on David Slade’s direction, the climactic battle, which several reviews single out as the first action in the series worth the name, and dialogue that is sharper and wrier than before. Taylor Lautner is the performer most often mentioned; more than one reviewer says he comes close to taking the film from its leads. Kristen Stewart is credited with giving Bella more of a personality.

The spread is wide. Reservations cluster on length, repetition and the drawn-out abstinence plot, with the historical flashbacks, some poor wigs and one laughable effects shot also noted. A third of the reviews are negative: The Guardian finds the saga turgid, Slant finds it inert and no better than its predecessors, and Den of Geek calls it bloated and poorly acted, though even that review exempts Lautner.

Empire
13 March 2009 · Will Lawrence
85*

Lawrence considers it the best Twilight film so far, with enough energy and humour to appeal beyond the fan base. He particularly praises Slade’s handling of the climactic battle and the film’s wry dialogue.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 October 2010 · Kirk Honeycutt
85*

Honeycutt finds that Eclipse finally gets the series’ tone right, balancing teenage passions with supernatural action. He especially praises David Slade’s direction and Taylor Lautner’s performance, which nearly steals the film.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
30 June 2010 · Betsy Sharkey
78*

Sharkey finds the film a lively improvement on its predecessors, praising its blend of romantic tension, action and humor. She singles out Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner for bringing greater emotional depth to their characters, while faulting the historical flashbacks for dragging.

Read the full review →
Variety
28 June 2010 · festival review · Peter Debruge
75*

Debruge finds that this installment finally delivers the blockbuster scale the franchise deserves. He praises its action and visual effects, especially the climactic battle, while noting that weak makeup and wigs undercut the fantasy.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Mark Williams
65*

The critic finds the film more stirring than its predecessor, despite its limited action and a laughable CGI moment. They praise the romantic triangle’s screwball banter and its evocative tent scene.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
27 June 2010 · John Hazelton
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its verdict is inaccessible. The available text does not reveal what the critic praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
Total Film
2 July 2010 · ★★★ · Jane Crowther
60

Crowther finds this a lively improvement on the previous film, though it remains too long and unlikely to win new fans. She praises the sharper dialogue, expanded action and more convincing vampire-battle effects.

Read the full review →
Time Out
2 July 2010 · ★★ · Tom Huddleston
40

Huddleston’s two-star rating indicates an underwhelming film. The page metadata focuses on whether David Slade can give the franchise a Harry Potter-like reinvention, but the review text is unavailable.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
29 June 2010 · ½/4 · Simon Abrams
12

Abrams delivers a sharply negative verdict, finding the film illogical, inert, and no better than its predecessors. He singles out Slade’s darker look as the main distinction, but says it amounts mostly to visible film grain.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
8 July 2010 · Peter Bradshaw
10*

Bradshaw gives the film a scathing verdict, arguing the saga has become increasingly turgid. He particularly mocks its prolonged abstinence plot and the strained tension between Edward and Jacob.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
1 July 2010
70*

The critic calls it a definite improvement over New Moon, though the angst and pacing can still wear thin. They praise Kristen Stewart’s portrayal of Bella and the added character detail for Riley, Jasper, and Rosalie.

Read the full review →
Paste
30 June 2010 · Ani Vrabel
70*

Vrabel considers Eclipse the strongest entry in the series, while noting that this is faint praise. She praises Bella’s more developed personality and the screenplay’s self-aware humor, but faults the film for plot holes and predictability.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
4 July 2010 · Susanna Krawczyk
65*

Krawczyk finds the film pretty good overall, despite sappy moments and problematic relationships. She praises its clear, well-managed action scenes and the sensitive handling of Bella’s sexual feelings.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
1 July 2010 · David Sztypuljak
35*

The critic finds the film overly long and repetitive, and says its darker tone does not overcome its weaknesses. He praises the vampire attack scenes and the climactic battle, while wishing the revenge plot received more attention.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
4 July 2010 · ★ · Ron Hogan
20

Hogan delivers a strongly negative verdict, calling the film bloated, poorly acted, and weighed down by stilted dialogue. He singles out Taylor Lautner as the one principal actor still making an effort to convey believable emotions.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate