The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2009)

Mintzer finds the sequel as good as, and perhaps better than, its predecessor, despite some rushed storytelling. He especially praises Kristen Stewart’s emotionally compelling performance, which gives depth to Bella’s heartbreak.

The review text is unavailable, so its verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint is visible in the accessible page.

Ebert considers the film a serviceable continuation, chiefly suited to fans of the series. Its Gothic romance is the element he singles out as central to its appeal.

Smith gives the sequel a three-star assessment and frames it as a study of sexual and romantic obsession. The available excerpt highlights that thematic focus but cuts off before revealing what she praises or faults.

The critic finds the sequel exceptionally faithful to the original, with its slow pace likely to test viewers outside the fan base. They praise the committed performances and dark, moody production values, though some dialogue provokes a smirk.

Koski finds the film tedious and unlikely to win new fans, though it delivers what its devoted audience wants. She praises the improved visuals and action, while criticizing the drawn-out subplots and wooden performances.

Crowther finds the film an overripe, melodramatic adaptation that will please devoted fans but falls short as a standalone film. She praises Michael Sheen’s entertaining performance, while criticizing the portentous tone and weak CGI wolves.

Bradshaw finds the sequel predictable and says the franchise is looking anaemic. He praises Kristen Stewart’s acting development and points to a few droll scenes as entertaining highlights.

Abrams sharply criticizes the film as an incoherent, morally troubling romance. He particularly objects to its presentation of Bella’s relationships with much older Edward and the werewolf Jacob as appealing.

The critic says the film is not for him but works for its intended audience, with strong performances and casting. He praises Kristen Stewart’s screen presence while faulting the sparse fights and ropey special effects.

Hogan finds the film only marginally better than its predecessor and overwhelmingly poor. He singles out Taylor Lautner as the lone acting standout, while criticizing the plot, performances, and CGI.

The review finds the sequel a draining, largely empty experience, with its middle section especially weakened by the lack of rapport between Stewart and Lautner. It praises Stewart for carrying the film and giving Bella emotional depth.

Fischer finds the film listless, unimaginative, and dramatically empty. He singles out the sharper technical craft compared with the first film, but says the improved effects cannot make up for the lack of genuine feeling.

The critic gives the film a strongly negative verdict, finding its central romance unconvincing and its characters joyless. He particularly faults the drawn-out adolescent angst and praises Anna Kendrick and Michael Welch for bringing flashes of fun to small roles.