Critics’ reviews

The Ugly Truth (2009)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 41: 0 positive, 5 mixed, 7 negative.

Back to our review of The Ugly Truth

41
Positive
0
Mixed
5
Negative
7

Most critics turn the film down, and none of the twelve reviews recommends it outright. The praise, such as it is, lands on the leads rather than the film around them: Gerard Butler’s affable, lived-in charm comes up repeatedly, and Katherine Heigl is called likeable and a natural fit for the genre. The complaints are just as consistent. The jokes are crude, the plot is formulaic and predictable, and several reviews object to its dated picture of career women.

The reviews part over whether the two stars work together. Slant and The Hollywood Reporter find their chemistry sharp and watchable; Radio Times and Time Out think their strengths cancel each other out. The spread is wide, from mild shrugs that call it enjoyable enough to outright pans from the Los Angeles Times and The Guardian, which finds blushes but no laughs. Den of Geek’s high mark belongs to the disc’s picture and sound, not the film, which it dismisses as crude and unfunny.

Screen Daily
20 July 2009 · Tim Grierson
64*

The paywall shell does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It provides no praise or complaint to identify.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 July 2009
64*

The URL indicates a New York Times review of the 2009 film. The page content is inaccessible, so its verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
19 July 2009 · Stephen Farber
55*

Farber finds the film uneven but amusing enough to get by, with its leads’ chemistry helping it reach a satisfying ending. He praises their effervescent dance scene, while faulting the crude jokes and underused supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 July 2009 · ★★/4 · Matt Noller
50

Noller finds the film formulaic and its jokes hit-or-miss, though the leads make it pleasurably watchable. He especially praises Heigl and Butler’s brittle, sharp chemistry and their performances.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Karen Krizanovich
40

The review finds the film uneven, with the leads appealing individually but lacking chemistry together. It singles out the script’s prickly, if unmemorable, banter as a saving grace.

Read the full review →
Time Out
4 August 2009 · ★★ · Anna Smith
40

Smith finds the two leads’ strengths and weaknesses cancel each other out. She singles out Heigl as a rom-com asset and Butler as frequently miscast.

Read the full review →
Empire
29 July 2009 · Helen O'Hara
35*

O’Hara finds the comedy patchy and its portrayal of women frustrating, despite a familiar romantic-comedy setup. She praises Butler’s charm and casting, but says the material does not give him enough support.

Read the full review →
Variety
18 July 2009 · Todd McCarthy
30*

McCarthy finds the romantic comedy contrived and predictable, with performances that often lack comic spontaneity. He singles out Gerard Butler’s affable, lived-in charm as an asset.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 July 2009 · Michael Phillips
15*

Phillips pans the film as witless, formulaic, and regressive. He criticizes its dated stereotypes of career women and says its performers’ comic skills are wasted.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
7 August 2009 · Catherine Shoard
10*

Shoard delivers a sharply negative verdict, saying the film raises blushes but earns no laughs. She faults its tin-eared raunch and implausible world, despite noting a spark of chemistry between the leads.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
5 August 2009
55*

The critic finds the comedy formulaic and lacklustre, though ultimately enjoyable. They praise Katherine Heigl’s likeability and Gerard Butler’s comic charm, while faulting the film for crude jokes and an underdeveloped lead character.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
10 February 2010 · 5 out of 5 · Carley Tauchert
38*

Tauchert strongly condemns the film as crude, unfunny, and insulting, with an obvious story and weak performances. She singles out the script and the leads’ performances as major failures, while praising the Blu-ray’s picture and sound.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate