Critics’ reviews

The Wild Bunch (1969)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 74: 6 positive, 5 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Wild Bunch

74
Positive
6
Mixed
5
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to The Wild Bunch, with praise clustering around Peckinpah’s forceful direction, the action sequences and the performances. Holden draws particular appreciation for bringing humanity, restraint and sadness to Pike Bishop. The favourable reviews find more than technical skill in the violence: they describe a film concerned with loyalty, ageing friendships and a changing world, whose humour and tenderness complicate its brutality.

The reservations concern its treatment of women, its apparent celebration of violence and moments when its energy threatens coherence. Variety offers the clearest mixed assessment, finding the film overlong and its first half digressive, while still admiring the direction and later action. The supplied scores range from mixed to enthusiastic, with none negative, but four entries lack enough accessible review text to establish their reasoning. The documented disagreement centres on how far the craft and emotional weight answer those objections.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
100

Hutchinson calls it one of the greatest westerns ever made, while acknowledging the controversy around its violence and portrayal of outlaws. He praises William Holden’s laconic, romantic performance as Pike Bishop.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · John Naughton
85*

The critic praises the film as a beautiful, poignant epic. They single out the superb performances and Peckinpah’s technical command of the set-pieces.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
26 February 1995 · Kenneth Turan
85*

Turan argues that the film’s greatness extends well beyond its once-controversial violence. He singles out Peckinpah’s filmmaking craft, the performances, and the restored scenes’ emotional impact.

Read the full review →
The Independent
18 June 2005 · David Thomson
85*

Thomson finds the film irresistible: a beautiful, sad, and funny meditation on fatalism and a changing world. He especially praises its nuanced portrayal of loyalty and old friendships, while noting its troubling depiction of women and its celebration of violence.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
75*

The critic finds the film a powerful, ambivalent poem of violence, though it teeters on the edge of incoherence. They praise Peckinpah’s filmmaking energy and the mythic life he gives the gang.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· William Pechter
65*

The issue listing identifies William Pechter's piece as a review of The Wild Bunch. The review text is unavailable here, so its verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be verified from the supplied text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 June 1969 · Vincent Canby
64*

The page is inaccessible, so its verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint is available from the supplied text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· NF
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but the critic’s verdict is unavailable. The description highlights the film’s opening image of children tormenting a scorpion and its bloody finale.

Read the full review →
Variety
18 June 1969 · Whitney Williams
50*

The review is mixed, criticizing the film’s excessive length and digressive first half while finding its later action compelling. It singles out Peckinpah’s forceful direction and the realism of the action sequences for praise.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
18 March 2009 · Jeff Robson
85*

Robson calls it a revolutionary, outstanding Western, while noting its treatment of women as the film’s one serious flaw. He praises the memorable action and Holden’s humane, pathos-rich performance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate