Critics’ reviews

The Wolf Man (1941)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 71: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Wolf Man

71
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to The Wolf Man, with praise clustering around its sympathy for Larry Talbot and the craft that gives his predicament weight. The favourable reviews value the tragedy as much as the scares, finding lasting interest in the suggestion of evil beneath respectable appearances. Foggy forest sets, make-up, direction and script all earn approval. Lon Chaney Jr.’s performance is a particular source of praise for its anguish and tenderness.

The verdicts nevertheless span a wide range, and Chaney is a point of disagreement: The AV Club criticises his performance while singling out Jack Pierce’s make-up for praise. Collider admires the central relationship but finds the film cut short. Variety supplies the clearest negative verdict, questioning its entertainment value despite approving of the direction and acting. The two partially accessible reviews offer too little evidence to establish their reservations.

Empire
25 January 2010 · Kim Newman
90*

Newman calls it a classic and the definitive werewolf movie. He particularly praises its wonderfully foggy fake forests and enduring status among Universal’s classic monsters.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
10 February 2010 · B+ · Keith Phipps
83

Phipps praises the film’s lasting resonance as a monster story about evil lurking beneath modern respectability. He criticizes Lon Chaney Jr.’s performance, while singling out Jack Pierce’s masterful makeup as the film’s saving visual force.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The review says the Universal horror classic still retains much of its power. It praises the intelligent script, direction, make-up and Lon Chaney Jr's sympathetic performance.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 June 1994
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint is visible in the supplied text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DMacp
64*

The page identifies this as Time Out’s review of the 1941 film, but the review text is unavailable. Its visible blurb singles out Claude Rains trying to persuade his son that the werewolf is imaginary, while offering no clear verdict.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1940 · Variety Staff
40*

The review finds the film well made but dubious entertainment. It praises the direction and performances, especially Lon Chaney’s competent work in both sides of his role.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
21 May 2004 · Keith Dudhnath
80*

The critic finds the film a richly empathetic horror classic whose subtlety matters more than its scares. They praise Curt Siodmak’s script and Lon Chaney Jr.’s performance for bringing Larry Talbot’s anguish to life.

Read the full review →
Collider
17 January 2025 · 7/10 · Gaby Shedwick
70

Shedwick finds the film a tender, tragic horror story that has stood the test of time, despite feeling cut short. She especially praises Lon Chaney Jr.’s performance and the chemistry between the leads.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate