Critics’ reviews

Thirteen Days (2000)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 64: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Thirteen Days

64
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics come down in favour of Thirteen Days, and the praise gathers around the cast. Bruce Greenwood’s Kennedy is the performance singled out most often, with several reviewers calling it compelling or better, and Kevin Costner draws warm notices from some. The film itself is generally described as a gripping, intelligent reconstruction of the missile crisis, restrained in tone and careful in its handling of the arguments around the table, and admirers credit it with avoiding triumphalism.

The reservations cluster on scope. More than one review notes that the film stays inside Washington and leaves out the wider diplomacy, Britain’s part in events and any women of consequence. Variety finds the presentation conventional enough to resemble expensive television. The spread is wide: two critics reject the film outright, with The AV Club judging Costner’s character superfluous and Eye for Film calling the whole thing dull and the Kennedy portrayals unconvincing.

Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
85*

The critic finds it a riveting, intelligent political thriller and a powerful tribute to Washington’s leaders. They single out the performances, especially Bruce Greenwood’s portrayal of JFK, for praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Joanna Berry
80

Berry finds the historical drama fascinating and its performances compelling. She singles out Bruce Greenwood as mesmerising and Kevin Costner as superb.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
75*

The critic finds the docudrama gripping and intelligently re-enacted, while noting that it is shaped by Hollywood values rather than historical hindsight. They praise its tense portrayal of the crisis and the graphic re-creation of the aerial incidents, but fault its omission of Britain’s role.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 March 2001 · Philip French
75*

French finds the film an engrossing, restrained docu-drama that presents the crisis without triumphalism. He praises its depiction of the Kennedy brothers’ response, while noting the absence of wider diplomatic efforts and women in positions of power.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 December 2000 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
70*

McCarthy finds the film a solid, absorbing historical thriller, though its conventional presentation has the feel of a high-end television production. He praises the capable ensemble and the measured handling of tense political debates.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 December 2000
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the accessible material.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
64*

The available page text does not reveal the critic’s overall verdict. Its description singles out the film’s narrow focus on Washington, especially Kenny O’Donnell’s perspective.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
25 December 2000 · Keith Phipps
40*

Phipps finds the film handsomely mounted and well acted but ultimately constrained by its narrow focus and weak point of view. He praises Bruce Greenwood and Steven Culp, while singling out Kevin Costner’s character as superfluous.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
23 March 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
10*

The critic pans the film as dull and poorly made. He singles out the unconvincing portrayals of the Kennedys and Costner’s weak Boston accent.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate