Critics’ reviews

Touch of Evil (1958)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 86: 12 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Touch of Evil

86
Positive
12
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics are strongly favourable, with praise clustering around the film’s visual craft, sustained tension and Welles’s performance as the corrupt Captain Quinlan. The opening tracking shot draws repeated attention for its control and suspense, while the expressionistic cinematography gives the noir melodrama much of its force. The reviews also value the moral ambiguity and depth of character, finding more than thriller mechanics beneath the elaborate staging.

Reservations are scattered rather than shared, and several concern particular versions or releases rather than the film itself. Little White Lies finds the story potentially contrived, while Variety welcomes the reconstruction’s greater clarity without seeing it as a change in the film’s artistic standing. The handling of music produces a smaller distinction: The AV Club praises the revised opening without music for increasing suspense, whereas Variety regrets the absence of Mancini’s theme over the end credits.

Little White Lies
10 July 2015 · 4/5/5 · David Jenkins
100

Jenkins praises the film as a soulful, baroque character study that upends conventional ideas of heroism and villainy. He singles out its eccentric supporting characters and surreal climax, while noting that the story can seem contrived.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tony Sloman
100

Sloman regards the film as a major American masterwork and a culmination of film noir. He praises its enduring stature and its deeply disturbing melodrama.

Read the full review →
Time Out
5 July 2015 · ★★★★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
100

The review calls the film a masterclass in tension, visual panache and B-movie excess. It singles out the legendary three-minute tracking shot as a standout.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2011 · Angie Errigo
90*

Errigo regards the film as a superb and influential noir masterpiece. She especially praises its audacious cinematography, including the celebrated opening shot and its complex set-pieces.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
25 April 2022 · ★★★★½ · Budd Wilkins
90

Wilkins treats the film as a landmark noir whose moral ambiguity remains potent. He praises the UHD transfers for their clarity and depth, especially in the night scenes.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
9 July 2015 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Bradshaw praises the restored film as a brilliant, remarkable noir melodrama. He singles out Welles’s Shakespearean performance as the corrupt Captain Quinlan.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
6 September 1998 · Kenneth Turan
85*

Turan welcomes the re-edited version as a clearer realization of Welles’ intentions. He particularly praises Welles’ commanding performance and the film’s expressionistic cinematography.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Keith Phipps
85*

Phipps praises the restored version and considers the film one of Welles’s best. He singles out the revised, music-free opening as more suspenseful and Welles’s corrupt cop as especially compelling.

Read the full review →
The Independent
9 July 2015 · Geoffrey Macnab
85*

Macnab regards the film as a magnificent work, elevated from a B-movie thriller to Shakespearean grandeur. He singles out Welles’s performance and the celebrated, unbroken opening scene for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
7 September 2008 · Stephanie Zacharek
85*

Zacharek praises the film as a seductive, precisely crafted noir that rewards repeated viewing. She singles out Welles’s commanding screen presence and the chance to compare three versions of the film.

Read the full review →
Variety
23 December 1998 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
70*

McCarthy finds the reconstruction a worthwhile, clearer presentation that will please Welles enthusiasts, though it does not change the film’s artistic standing. He praises the improved sound mix and the way the pristine print reveals Welles’ visual craft, while wishing Mancini’s theme had been included over the end credits.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The page text was inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise cannot be verified. No review details are available to summarize reliably.

Read the full review →
Collider
10 June 2014 · Rob Vaux
75*

The critic praises the film as a richly layered noir masterpiece, while criticizing the Blu-ray for offering little new to existing owners. He especially singles out the depth of the characters and Welles’ overlapping dialogue.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate