Critics’ reviews

Transcendence (2014)

25 reviews from 25 publications. Critics’ score 41: 2 positive, 8 mixed, 15 negative.

Back to our review of Transcendence

41
Positive
2
Mixed
8
Negative
15

Most critics reject this one, and fifteen of the 25 reviews are outright negative. Where there is agreement, it is on two points. The ideas are ambitious: most reviews credit the film with asking serious questions about machine intelligence and what survives of a person uploaded into one. And Rebecca Hall is the thing that works, praised across the spread for grounding the story in loss; several reviews name her as its only human presence. The cinematography draws steady, if faint, approval too.

The reservations cluster on the script. Critics call the romance lifeless, the plot muddled, the exposition clunky, and Johnny Depp’s performance distant and listless. Several find the philosophical musings and the commercial action working against each other. The spread is wide, from 15 to 75. The Los Angeles Times is the clear dissenter, finding the film provocative and its refusal to simplify a virtue; IndieWire is the only other review that leans positive.

Los Angeles Times
17 April 2014 · Kenneth Turan
75*

Turan finds the film ambitious and provocative, with its nuanced treatment of artificial intelligence outweighing its shortcomings. He particularly praises its refusal to simplify the difficult questions raised by Will’s transformation.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
15 April 2014 · B- · Eric Kohn
70

Kohn finds the film intellectually provocative and potentially prescient, but uneven and less engaging than its ideas. He especially praises Rebecca Hall’s credible pathos and the film’s lasting relevance in its exploration of technology and reality.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
16 April 2014 · ★★½/4 · Matt Zoller Seitz
62

The review finds the film disappointing despite its ambitious ideas. Its treatment of artificial intelligence is singled out as a weakness.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Terry Staunton
60

Staunton gives the film three stars, indicating a mixed verdict. He singles out its complicated techno-fable premise as a defining feature.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
17 April 2014 · C- · A.A. Dowd
50

Dowd finds the film humorless, outdated, and dramatically lifeless. He especially criticizes its unconvincing central romance and lack of humanity.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
16 April 2014 · Tim Grierson
40*

The review suggests the film’s grand themes lack resonance. It finds greater emotional impact in the more modest exploration of intimate relationships.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 April 2014 · ★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
40

The review finds the thriller dull and questions why Johnny Depp took the role. It singles out the story’s lack of wackiness as a major disappointment.

Read the full review →
Total Film
24 April 2014 · ★★ · Jamie Graham
40

Graham finds the film a disappointment despite its ideas and gleaming visuals. He singles out its surface-level musings and monotonous, underwhelming action as major weaknesses.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 April 2014 · ★½/4 · Eric Henderson
38

Henderson finds the film regressive and less recognizably human than its ambitions suggest. He faults its detours into sci-fi cliché, especially beside the more effective questions explored in Her.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
26 April 2014 · Michael Atkinson
35*

Atkinson finds the film timid and dramatically clumsy, despite its timely engagement with unsettling questions about technology. He praises its willingness to challenge the presumed goodness of virtual life, while faulting its plot holes and lifeless scenes of characters explaining computer screens.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
15 April 2014 · Todd McCarthy
35*

McCarthy finds the film intellectually ambitious but dramatically muddled, with its ideas and commercial action working against each other. He praises Rebecca Hall’s alert, unpredictable performance while faulting the story for losing its emotional connection.

Read the full review →
Vulture
18 April 2014 · Bilge Ebiri
35*

Ebiri finds the film an unsuccessful blend of science-fiction ideas and action, though it has some genuine pathos. He praises Rebecca Hall’s portrayal of loss, while criticizing the contrived dystopia and Johnny Depp’s emotionally distant performance.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
· Tom Shone
30*

Shone finds the thriller insubstantial and too familiar. He singles out how little life remains in Johnny Depp’s digitized character.

Read the full review →
Empire
20 December 2013 · William Thomas
20*

Thomas finds the film a banal, disappointing techno-thriller that squanders its cast and filmmaker. He praises the effective camerawork but says it serves a weak, uncreative script.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
25 April 2014 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
20*

O'Sullivan finds the film derivative and poorly scripted, with an unconvincing emotional core. She singles out its elegant cinematography as the main compensating quality.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
20*

The critic finds the film shapeless and dramatically inexperienced. They single out its cheesy look, with only a few shots escaping that criticism.

Read the full review →
Variety
15 April 2014 · Scott Foundas
15*

Foundas finds the film dramatically undernourished, humorless, and emotionally empty. He particularly criticizes the bland characters and Johnny Depp’s listless performance, which fails to convey the scientist’s passion or curiosity.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
16 April 2014
64*

The page is blocked by anti-crawler protection, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be verified. The URL identifies it as a review of the 2014 film Transcendence.

Read the full review →
Collider
17 April 2014 · C- · Matt Goldberg
50

The critic finds the film stale, emotionally hollow, and burdened by familiar philosophical questions. He singles out its beautiful cinematography as a strength, but says it cannot overcome the sterile storytelling.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
17 April 2014 · ★★½ · David Crow
50

Crow finds the film ambitious but muddled, with its big ideas undermined by a lifeless romance and an unclear plot. He praises Rebecca Hall for providing the film’s only human touch.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
23 April 2014 · 2 · Emma Dibdin
47*

Dibdin judges the film a ponderous, clunky disappointment that feels out of step with modern technology. She praises Rebecca Hall and Paul Bettany’s emotionally grounded performances, while noting that Pfister’s crisp visuals cannot overcome the script’s shortcomings.

Read the full review →
Paste
18 April 2014 · 3.9 · Brent Simon
46*

Simon finds the film over-plotted, shallow, and emotionally inert, ultimately mistaking incident for dramatic connection. He praises its visual polish and occasional striking imagery, but says these cannot compensate for the weak script and thin characters.

Read the full review →
/Film
17 April 2014 · 2.0 out of 10.0 · Angie Han
43*

Han finds the film dull, illogical, and dramatically underdeveloped. She singles out Rebecca Hall and Paul Bettany for bringing some warmth and chemistry to their stiff characters.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
16 April 2014
30*

The critic finds the film’s promising ideas undermined by a nonsensical plot and an unsatisfying resolution. Rebecca Hall’s committed performance is singled out as its strongest element.

Read the full review →
Consequence
21 April 2014 · Dominick Suzanne-Mayer
15*

The critic finds the film a dull, illogical failure that squanders its ideas and cast. They single out its engaging CGI and action sequences as rare bright spots, while criticizing Johnny Depp’s performance and the overexplained, emotionally thin story.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate