Critics’ reviews

Transformers (2007)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 59: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Transformers

59
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
4

The reviews are divided on Transformers, with praise clustering around the robots and the technical work that brings them to life. Even several sceptical critics admire the intricate transformations, kinetic movement and visual effects, while the more enthusiastic responses find Michael Bay’s spectacle exuberant, goofy and entertaining. The human characters attract less enthusiasm, and favourable reviews often accept weak writing and loose logic as the price of the machinery.

The main disagreement is over whether the action remains enjoyable when the noise, cutting and tangled story lines take over. Several critics find the combat difficult to follow, though /Film specifically praises the clearer climax in the IMAX presentation. Reservations also gather around thin characterisation, laboured comedy and military subplots. The spread is wide: some reviews enjoy the spectacle despite its faults, while others find those same faults exhausting enough to outweigh the effects.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The four-star rating indicates a positive verdict on Bay’s oversized sci-fi adventure. The review notes its familiar echoes of E.T. and other popular fantasies.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
8 October 2007 · ★★★★ · Nick Schager
80

Schager condemns the film as a shallow, militaristic spectacle with little interest in its characters. He praises the elaborate sound design, while criticizing the chaotic action and the film’s treatment of its characters.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
75*

Nathan finds the film an exuberant, goofy action spectacle, despite its weak script and loose logic. He especially praises the intricately detailed, spectacular robot transformations.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
28 June 2007 · Kirk Honeycutt
75*

Honeycutt finds the film noisy, entertaining fun, though its action and story lines sometimes snarl. He praises how Michael Bay coordinates the stunts, animation and characters, while criticizing the overly loud sound and forceful score.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
7 December 2007 · Rob Mackie
55*

Mackie finds the film ludicrous but entertaining in fits and starts. He praises the transforming robots’ kinetic movement and occasional funny lines, while noting that the comedy and exposition clank.

Read the full review →
Time Out
23 July 2007 · ★★ · Ben Walters
40

The two-star review is skeptical of the film’s premise. It singles out the cars’ environmental implications amid the explosive action spectacle.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
2 July 2007 · ★½/4 · Roger Ebert
38

Ebert finds the film loud and incoherent, with little substance beneath its spectacle. He singles out the robots as its main appeal, while criticizing how hard it is to follow the action.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
1 July 2007 · Anthony Lane
35*

Lane is sharply critical of the film’s noisy, toy-driven spectacle, though he calls it Bay’s first truly honest work of art. He singles out Bay’s sincere fascination with machines, while faulting the film’s thin characterization and borrowed plot.

Read the full review →
/Film
21 September 2007 · Peter Sciretta
85*

The review strongly recommends seeing Transformers on the big screen, especially in IMAX. It praises the clearer, easier-to-follow climax but says the added footage offers little value.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
9 July 2007 · ★★★ · American Bob
60

The critic finds the film weak in its characterization and padded with pointless military and comedic subplots. They praise Bay’s car-chase direction, polished visuals, and especially the freeway fight featuring Optimus Prime.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
27 July 2007 · Scott Macdonald
30*

The critic finds the film entertaining in flashes but ultimately a tedious, poorly written spectacle. He praises the astonishing visual effects while faulting the frenetic editing and noisy action for undermining them.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate