Critics’ reviews

Tristana (1970)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 74: 5 positive, 4 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Tristana

74
Positive
5
Mixed
4
Negative
0

The reviews lean favourable, with praise clustering around the performances and Buñuel’s treatment of repression, corruption and unequal relationships. Catherine Deneuve draws admiration for her chilling performance, while Fernando Rey earns praise even from critics less persuaded by the film around him. The more enthusiastic readings find complicated characters, unsettling dreamlike passages and a sly connection between sexual and political repression; they value the film’s resistance to simple explanations.

The spread runs from strong enthusiasm to qualified approval, with disagreement chiefly over how much subtlety and irreverence Buñuel brings to the material. Slant Magazine finds an accessible introduction to his work, but faults the blunt symbolism and obvious dialogue. Variety is more reserved, describing a sombre, unusually respectful film with only intermittent flashes of mischief, though it singles out Rey for praise. These reservations concern the handling of the material rather than the central performances.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

Parkinson calls the film a bitter, brilliant indictment of corruption and decay. He praises Fernando Rey’s performance as Don Lope and Catherine Deneuve’s chilling portrayal of the victim turned tormentor.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 February 2013 · Critic's Pick · Betsy Sharkey
84*

Sharkey presents the restored film as a rare opportunity to appreciate Buñuel’s range and rebellious vision. She especially praises Catherine Deneuve’s performance and the restoration’s subtle, muted colors.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
20 March 2013 · B+ · Scott Tobias
83

Tobias finds the film rich in mystery and meaning, with characters too complicated to reduce to simple types. He praises Buñuel’s layered treatment of the story and the film’s elusive, dreamlike strangeness.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
19 November 2015 · Richard Brody
80*

Brody presents the film as a forceful, slyly satirical drama. He praises how Buñuel links sexual repression and political repression without sacrificing the story’s disturbing immediacy.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 September 2003 · ★★★/4 · Ed Gonzalez
75

Gonzalez finds the film mundane but competent, and a useful entry point to Buñuel. He praises its surrealist force near the end, while criticizing its blunt symbolism and obvious dialogue.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CA
67*

The available description frames the film as a mockingly sensible black comedy. It singles out the Toledo setting and the young ward’s relationship with her old guardian.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be inspected, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint can be verified.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 September 1970 · Vincent Canby
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. Its praise or complaints about the film likewise cannot be confirmed.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1969 · Variety Staff
50*

The review finds the film somber and more respectful than expected, with only occasional flashes of Buñuel’s irreverence. It singles out Fernando Rey as superb in his role.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate