Critics’ reviews

Under Siege (1992)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 72: 4 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Under Siege

72
Positive
4
Mixed
3
Negative
0

The reviews lean positive on Under Siege, with praise centring on energetic action and villains who make the familiar plotting entertaining. Most critics with substantive comments available find it effective escapism, particularly when Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Busey are allowed to be extravagant. Davis’s direction also earns credit for keeping the action brisk and forceful, while The Hollywood Reporter singles out the battleship as a commanding presence in its own right.

Reservations concern formula, excess and how much the film offers beyond uncomplicated thrills. Variety faults the thin political context and a brief, disappointing climax. Seagal divides opinion more clearly: The Hollywood Reporter finds his performance part of the appeal, while Radio Times argues that Jones and the supporting cast compensate for his lack of charisma. The scores span mixed to positive, with no outright negative verdicts recorded, though two reviews lack enough accessible text to establish their reasoning.

The Hollywood Reporter
9 October 2017 · Duane Byrge
88*

Byrge considers the film a thrilling, well-crafted action hit, with Seagal’s performance adding to its appeal. He especially praises Davis’s visceral direction and the battleship’s commanding presence as a character in its own right.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

Ferguson calls the film a slick nautical spin on the Die Hard concept. He says Tommy Lee Jones’s flamboyant performance, backed by Gary Busey and Colm Meaney, compensates for Seagal’s lack of charisma.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
9 October 1992 · MICHAEL WILMINGTON
70*

Wilmington finds the film an entertaining, cheerfully over-the-top thriller despite its excesses and a possible commercial miscalculation. He praises its willingness to embrace its own absurdity and single outs Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Busey’s wild comic performances.

Read the full review →
Variety
9 October 1992 · Emanuel Levy
70*

Levy finds the film slick and entertaining despite its formulaic action and weak political context. He praises the action set-pieces and strong performances from Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Busey, while faulting the brief, disappointing climax.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
65*

Nathan finds the film entertaining as uncomplicated escapism, while noting it offers little beyond that. He praises the energetic, well-paced action and the villains’ over-the-top performances.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 October 1992 · Janet Maslin
64*

The review text was inaccessible, so its verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the available page.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CM
64*

The review’s verdict cannot be determined from the available page text. No specific praise or complaint is visible.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate