Critics’ reviews

Waiting for the Barbarians (2019)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 56: 3 positive, 5 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Waiting for the Barbarians

56
Positive
3
Mixed
5
Negative
4

The reviews split three ways, with mixed verdicts the largest group and the overall lean cool rather than hostile. Almost every critic, whatever the final judgement, praises Mark Rylance’s performance as the Magistrate, describing it as humane, nervous and expressive, and more than one says he comes close to holding the film together on his own. The widescreen desert photography is the other point of agreement, admired even by those who find little else to like.

The reservations cluster on the allegory. Most critics find the film’s version of empire too vague and its characters too archetypal to land, and several call the pacing stolid or bloated. Sight and Sound finds it a fresh and vital parable and Radio Times is similarly warm, while The Independent faults it for never examining its hero’s complicity. The spread is wide, from warm four-star notices to reviews that think it dull, and Johnny Depp’s restrained villain earns praise only at Slant.

Sight and Sound
6 September 2019 · John Bleasdale
85*

Bleasdale finds the film a fresh and vital parable of empire, despite its potentially over-neat allegory and familiar message. He singles out Mark Rylance’s quietly humane performance for praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Andrew Collins
80

Collins gives the film a positive four-star verdict. He singles out Mark Rylance’s soulful portrayal of the Magistrate amid the colonial brutality.

Read the full review →
Variety
6 September 2019 · festival review · Guy Lodge
65*

Lodge finds the adaptation uneven at first but increasingly poetic, powerful, and stirring. He especially praises the desert journey’s widescreen cinematography and its evocative compositions.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
6 August 2020
64*

The URL identifies a review of the 2019 film, but the page returned only an access error. Its verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
3 August 2020 · ★★½/4 · Pat Brown
62

Brown finds the adaptation visually and emotionally less effective than Coetzee’s novel, though it retains awareness of colonialism’s consequences. He praises Johnny Depp’s restrained portrayal of authoritarian severity and the film’s refusal to treat symbolic gestures as meaningful reparation.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
6 September 2019 · C · Ben Croll
57

Croll finds the film disappointing, arguing that its anti-imperialist message is delivered without enough artistic boldness. He singles out the film’s vague allegorical world-building as a weakness, despite praising its performances and technical craft.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 September 2019 · festival review · Guardian staff reporter
45*

The critic finds the drama stately and frequently horrific, but too unsubtle, with uneven performances. The striking widescreen desert compositions are singled out for their beauty.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
6 September 2019 · festival review · Jonathan Romney
40*

Romney finds the adaptation bloated overall, despite a strong performance from Mark Rylance. He singles out Rylance as the film’s main strength.

Read the full review →
The Independent
10 September 2020 · ★★ · Clarisse Loughrey
40

Loughrey finds the colonialism allegory too vague and airless to make an impact. She praises Mark Rylance’s humane, nervous performance, while faulting the film for failing to examine its hero’s complicity.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 August 2020 · Justin Chang
35*

Chang finds the film proficient but dramatically stolid, and less trenchant than Guerra’s earlier work. He praises Mark Rylance’s nuanced portrayal, while faulting the relationship with the Girl for feeling overly polite and dramatically timid.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
6 September 2019 · festival review · Boyd van Hoeij
35*

The critic finds the film’s broad allegory dull and its characters too archetypal to make the story resonate. He praises its impressive visuals and singles out Mark Rylance’s expressive performance as nearly making it work.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
4 August 2020 · Jennie Kermode
70*

Kermode finds the film thoughtful and worthwhile despite its slow pace and deliberately drab imagery. She especially praises Mark Rylance’s performance, which carries the Magistrate’s loneliness and disillusionment.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate