Critics’ reviews

WHAM! (2023)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 69: 10 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of WHAM!

69
Positive
10
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics find this an affectionate, enjoyable account of George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley’s partnership, with praise clustering around the archive footage and the pair’s candid voices. The music supplies much of the pleasure, while the friendship gives the documentary its warmth. Several reviews welcome the attention paid to Ridgeley’s support for Michael’s songwriting. Even some less enthusiastic responses find the scrapbook presentation appealing and the celebration of the duo’s early years entertaining.

The disagreement is over how much the film reveals beneath that cheerful surface. The Evening Standard finds it illuminating and refreshingly restrained in its praise; The i Paper considers it fawning and shallow, despite enjoying the portrait of the friendship. Digital Spy offers the sharpest objection, finding too little exploration of Michael’s closeted identity and struggles. Reservations elsewhere concern pacing, limited discoveries for established fans and stories left unexplored. The spread is wide, despite the clear positive majority.

Variety
8 July 2023 · Owen Gleiberman
85*

Gleiberman finds the documentary joyful and more substantial than a simple nostalgia trip, while tracing George Michael’s artistic ambition. He especially praises how it captures the distinctive energy and musical richness of Wham!’s best songs.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
17 June 2023 · ★★★★ · El Hunt
80

Hunt finds the documentary genuinely illuminating and refreshingly free of exaggerated praise, despite some pacing issues. She particularly praises the candid archived narration from George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley.

Read the full review →
Total Film
23 June 2023 · ★★★★ · James Mottram
80

The critic finds the documentary buoyant, joyful, and warmly positive about the band’s friendship. He especially praises how the archival footage and interview audio convey Ridgeley’s support for Michael’s songwriting.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
5 July 2023 · Noel Murray
75*

Murray finds the documentary an enjoyable treat for fans of 1980s culture, though longtime followers may learn little that is new. He praises the wealth of audio and video that gives both George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley room to share grounded perspectives.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
17 June 2023 · festival review · Fionnuala Halligan
70*

The available description presents the documentary as a peppy account of WHAM!’s early days. It highlights George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley recounting their proto-boy-band beginnings; the full review is behind a paywall.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
5 July 2023 · Ben Kenigsberg
70*

The review presents the documentary as a compact, warmly nostalgic look back at Wham!. It singles out the archival material as a strength.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 June 2023 · Peter Bradshaw
60*

Bradshaw finds the documentary entertaining and moving, but frustratingly incurious about the people behind Wham!’s success. He praises the scrapbook framing and the joy of the music while faulting its failure to explore the friendship, sexuality, and music more deeply.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
5 July 2023 · Emily Baker
35*

Baker finds the documentary overly fawning and shallow, though she sees it as a fun celebration of Wham!’s era. She praises its warm portrait of George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley’s symbiotic friendship.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
17 July 2023
85*

The headline presents the documentary as excellent. It singles out friendship and music as taking center stage.

Read the full review →
NME
5 July 2023 · ★★★★ · Alex Flood
80

The review finds the documentary affectionate, intimate and poignant while remaining upbeat. It praises the friendship at the centre of the story and Ridgeley’s importance beyond being a supporting figure.

Read the full review →
Paste
6 July 2023 · 7.8 · Tara Bennett
77*

Bennett finds the documentary an engrossing, intimate time capsule, though it leaves gaps in Andrew Ridgeley’s life and the aftermath of George Michael’s death. She praises how Michael’s archival audio and Ridgeley’s present-day reflections create the feeling of an ongoing conversation between the friends.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
9 July 2023 · Amber Wilkinson
76*

Wilkinson finds the documentary’s positive portrait of the duo’s partnership refreshing and lively. She particularly praises its archival material and animation, while noting that it leaves some post-split stories unexplored.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
7 July 2023 · ★★★ · Laura Vickers-Green
60

The critic finds the documentary a cheerful, enjoyable celebration, though it avoids deeper or more complicated stories. She praises its generous archive footage and the candid voices of George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
5 July 2023 · David Opie
30*

Opie finds the documentary hollow and insufficiently serious about Michael’s story. He praises its scrapbook presentation and archive footage, but says it fails to explore Michael’s closeted identity and struggles.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate