Critics’ reviews

What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 75: 10 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?

75
Positive
10
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics are firmly in favour. Ten of the twelve reviews are positive, and the praise gathers almost entirely around Bette Davis and Joan Crawford, whose performances are described as fearless, grotesque and chilling, with Davis in particular credited for going furthest. Several critics also admire the film’s mix of psychodrama and black comedy, and its merciless view of a Hollywood that discards its stars once they age. A few note Aldrich’s direction and the vivid black-and-white cinematography as sharply constructed.

The reservations are few but pointed. Variety finds the opening inept and slow before the pace picks up, and Empire admits the mood makes for uncomfortable viewing. The one outright dissent comes from The New York Times, whose review on release treats the film as grisly horror rather than drama and objects to its excess. The spread is otherwise narrow, with the newer reviews warmer than the older ones.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

The review praises the film as an innovative, much-imitated chiller. It singles out Bette Davis and Joan Crawford’s hair-raising chemistry and performances as unmatched.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
6 June 2008 · Nathan Rabin
90*

Rabin considers the film a straight-up classic, praising its blend of warped psychodrama and pitch-black comedy. He especially singles out Bette Davis’s fearless, monstrous performance and the film’s gleefully lurid show-business satire.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 November 2012 · ★★★★ · Budd Wilkins
80

Wilkins praises the film as a demented, sharply constructed masterwork, while finding the Blu-ray presentation impressive. He singles out the sisters’ chilling shared psychopathy and the film’s vivid black-and-white cinematography.

Read the full review →
Total Film
4 December 2012 · ★★★★ · Jane Crowther
80

Crowther finds the film a masterclass in grotesque, antagonistic performance and a still-relevant comment on celebrity. She especially praises the deliciously ugly performances by Bette Davis and Joan Crawford.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2014 · Kim Newman
75*

Newman regards the film as a creepy, darkly comic classic, though its mood makes for an uncomfortable watch. He singles out Davis and Crawford’s committed performances, especially Davis’s disturbing mirror scene.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 December 2012 · Philip French
75*

French presents the film as a frightening, darkly comic classic and a merciless satire of Hollywood. He singles out the sisters’ twisted show-business history and the film’s debt to Sunset Boulevard.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
70*

The capsule presents the film as a sharply observed, grotesque melodrama. It singles out Davis and Crawford’s contrasting performances and Aldrich’s ironic imagery.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1961 · Variety Staff
70*

The review finds the film’s pace increasingly forceful after an inept, draggy start. It singles out Bette Davis’s performance as especially deserving of credit, while also praising Joan Crawford’s restrained portrayal.

Read the full review →
Time Out
7 December 2012 · ★★★ · Wally Hammond
60

The 3/5 rating suggests a mixed but appreciative verdict. The page’s description highlights the film’s muscular direction and lasting admiration, though the review text is unavailable.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
7 November 1962 · Bosley Crowther
20*

Crowther’s verdict was negative, treating the film as grotesque horror rather than effective drama. The sisters’ performances anchor the film, but the review objects to its grisly excess.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
10 December 2012 · ★★★★★ · Helen Wright
100

Wright presents the film as macabre, campy entertainment and celebrates its showbiz rivalry. She singles out Crawford and Davis’s furious attempts to out-act each other as making burlesque film history.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
26 January 2008 · Jennie Kermode
95*

Kermode calls it the greatest melodrama of its era and an unforgettable film. She especially praises Davis and Crawford’s towering performances and the script’s merciless wit.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate