Critics’ reviews

While You Were Sleeping (1995)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 67: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of While You Were Sleeping

67
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics like it, and they like it for the same reason: Sandra Bullock. Almost every review puts her at the centre, praising the warmth and comic timing of her performance, and several say she is what keeps a thin premise afloat. The family’s light banter draws praise too, and Turteltaub is credited with balancing the farce deftly. The general tone is of a sweet, old-fashioned fairytale that knows what it is.

The reservations are about the plot. Most reviews call it predictable, and more than one admits the deception at its heart is implausible and the whole thing tips into sentimentality. For most this is forgivable. The spread is fairly narrow, with one clear exception: the Los Angeles Times finds the film sugary and intent on coddling its audience, and thinks it makes Bullock too winsome, even while praising her scenes with Bill Pullman.

Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
80*

Thomas finds the romantic comedy enchanting despite its predictable plot and occasional sentimentality. He particularly praises Sandra Bullock’s comic performance, which keeps the story engaging.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Jones finds the romantic comedy warmly engaging and charming. He singles out Sandra Bullock’s performance and the film’s witty, smartly scripted turns for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
75*

The review presents the film as a sweet, appealing fairytale romance. It singles out the story’s cute and cuddly bedtime-story quality for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 April 1995 · Janet Maslin
70*

Maslin finds the romantic comedy appealing, with Sandra Bullock’s performance at its center. She singles out Bullock’s warmth as a strength despite the contrived premise.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 April 1995 · Leonard Klady
70*

Klady finds the romantic comedy’s implausible deception ultimately infectious and predicts it will connect with audiences. He praises Sandra Bullock’s likable, emotionally nuanced performance and Turteltaub’s deft balance of the farce.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
65*

The critic finds the film simple and predictable but ultimately diverting. They single out the family’s light banter and Sandra Bullock’s watchable performance.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
21 April 1995 · Peter Rainer
30*

Rainer finds the comedy amiable but overly sugary, predictable, and intent on coddling its audience. He praises Sandra Bullock’s engaging performance and her convincing scenes with Bill Pullman, while faulting the film for making her too winsome.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate