Critics’ reviews

Woman in the Dunes (1964)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 80: 8 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Woman in the Dunes

80
Positive
8
Mixed
0
Negative
0

All eight reviews are positive, and they agree on what carries the film: the way it makes sand feel like a physical presence. Critics return again and again to Teshigahara’s close-ups of sand on skin, water and bodies, and to the cramped shack, which several describe as tactile enough to be felt from the seat. Most read the story as an allegory of entrapment and find it haunting, praising its unsettling, oppressive atmosphere and its emotional reach.

The spread runs from solid approval to outright rapture, and the reservations are about the story rather than the images. The Los Angeles Times finds the tension slackening and the focus growing dense in places, and The New Yorker allows that the plot has irritations before the film’s harsh sensualism wins out. Time Out notes the allegory risks heaviness, though it judges the film gets away with it. The warmest reviews, from The AV Club and Eye for Film, have no such doubts.

The AV Club
29 March 2002 · A · Keith Phipps
95

Phipps finds the film a resonant, haunting parable for human existence. He especially praises the striking cinematography, which makes the sand and cramped shack feel palpable.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
80*

The review calls the film hypnotic and emotionally wrenching filmmaking. It singles out Teshigahara’s tactile close-ups of sand and skin and the film’s emotional range for praise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
25 August 2016 · ★★★★ · Clayton Dillard
80

Dillard finds the film a haunting, sharply ironic work about entrapment and self-importance. He praises Teshigahara’s camera for its striking, intimate attention to surfaces and bodies.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 August 1990 · MARK CHALON SMITH
75*

The critic finds the film disquieting and often startling, though its tension sometimes slackens and its focus grows dense. He praises the cinematography for making the dunes and mundane details feel striking and new.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 August 2006 · Rob Mackie
75*

Mackie presents the film as a strange, compelling and unclassifiable experience. He especially praises its tactile handling of sand, water and skin.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 March 2012
75*

The critic says the film makes its allegory work despite the risk of being heavy-handed. They single out its stark, creepy depiction of a man trapped in a sand pit.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
70*

The critic finds the film’s harsh sensualism ultimately overcomes the irritations of its plot. They single out Teshigahara’s spare, stylized imagery and its merging of bodies with the landscape.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
3 October 2006 · Anton Bitel
96*

Bitel calls the film an enigmatic masterpiece, praising its intense, unsettling atmosphere. He singles out the sand itself for its oppressive, entrapping presence.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate