Critics’ reviews

Written on the Wind (1956)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 78: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Written on the Wind

78
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Written on the Wind, with praise clustering around Sirk’s forceful melodrama and the way its images express the characters’ passions. Colour, shadow and expressive lighting receive particular attention, alongside Russell Metty’s camerawork. The performances also draw strong notices, especially Robert Stack’s troubled wealthy man and Dorothy Malone’s portrayal of anger and desire. Several reviews find substance beneath the excess, stressing sympathy for the volatile family members or criticism of the American Dream.

The clearest disagreement concerns how much emotional depth accompanies that excess. Slant Magazine relishes the audacity but finds the film comparatively shallow in its understanding of people. The ratings range from mixed to strongly positive, with no negative notices recorded. The two mixed reviews are inaccessible, however, so their specific objections cannot be established; the available criticism supports a clearer account of the enthusiasm than of the reservations.

Sight and Sound
90*

The page presents Sirk’s melodrama as a deliriously bold, highly accomplished work. It especially praises Russell Metty’s camerawork and the film’s sympathies for the volatile family members.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
17 December 2015 · Richard Brody
90*

Brody presents the film as one of Sirk’s greatest achievements and praises its ironic, operatic vision of American melodrama. He singles out the vivid colors and tangled shadows that turn the characters’ passions into striking visual tableaux.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
85*

The critic calls the film intense, powerful, and well worth seeing. They single out its tightly structured storytelling, expressive lighting, and symbolism.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
80

Hutchinson praises Sirk’s melodrama as a forceful indictment of the American Dream. He singles out Robert Stack and Dorothy Malone for outstanding portrayals of anger and arousal.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
4 March 2022 · ★★★★ · Eric Henderson
80

Henderson calls the film Sirk’s giddiest trash entertainment, while finding it the shallowest example of his humanist acuity. He praises its audacious melodrama, especially Marylee’s outrageous courtroom appearance and the film’s unabashed excess.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1955 · Variety Staff
80*

The review is strongly positive, praising the film’s script, direction and performances. It singles out Robert Stack’s portrayal of a wealthy, psychologically troubled man as especially compelling.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TR
70*

The available description presents the film as fresh and modern despite evoking its era. The article text is unavailable, so no further praise or criticism can be identified.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page shows only a browser-verification screen, so the critic’s verdict cannot be confirmed. Any praise or criticism is likewise unavailable.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 January 1957
64*

The headline identifies this as a review of the film, but the article text is inaccessible. Its verdict and any specific praise or criticism cannot be verified.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate