
Most critics find X-Men: Days of Future Past an entertaining, ambitious entry, with praise concentrated on its central performances and inventive action. James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender draw particular approval, while several reviews credit Bryan Singer with giving the sprawling story emotional weight. Quicksilver’s slow-motion sequence is the clearest point of agreement, winning over even critics less persuaded by the rest. The favourable reviews value the attention paid to characters amid the competing timelines.
Reservations centre on crowded plotting, uneven urgency and the demands placed on audience familiarity with the series. The spread runs from enthusiastic approval to mixed responses, with no wholly negative verdicts in the supplied reviews. Slant Magazine finds the parallel storylines uninventive and the dialogue emotionally hollow. The Wrap finds the film entertaining but exhausting, with the bleak future scenes upsetting the balance; elsewhere, critics differ over whether Singer keeps the large cast and complicated story sufficiently focused.
L
Los Angeles Times
22 May 2014 · Betsy Sharkey
86*
Sharkey finds the film a deeper, richer adventure and calls it Singer’s best X-Men film. She especially praises the cast, singling out the electric performances of James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender.
Read the full review →E
Empire
12 May 2014 · William Thomas
85*
The review finds the film largely fantastic and calls it the best X-Men film since the second. It especially praises the inventive action, singling out Quicksilver’s slow-motion sequence as a highlight.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
21 May 2014 · 4/4/4 · Chris Blohm
80
The critic calls it an ambitious, thrilling blockbuster, though its crowded cast weakens its focus. The review particularly praises Michael Fassbender’s performance and the film’s dazzling set-pieces.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★★ · Jeremy Aspinall
80
Aspinall calls Bryan Singer’s return triumphant and praises the ambitious, time-spanning story. The review also highlights how the film raises the stakes for the franchise.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
13 May 2014 · ★★★★ · Kevin Harley
80
Harley praises the film as an assured, brisk revival that balances superhero thrills with emotional depth. He especially singles out Singer’s focus on Xavier and Mystique, alongside the cast’s performances and the inventive action.
Read the full review →V
Variety
12 May 2014 · Justin Chang
78*
Chang finds the film an ambitious, emotionally resonant return to form for Bryan Singer. He especially praises the performances of McAvoy and Fassbender and the playful Quicksilver action sequence.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
22 May 2014 · B · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
77
Vishnevetsky finds the film’s comics-style storytelling narratively satisfying, though potentially alienating to newcomers. He praises its extravagant effects sequences and its ability to use audience familiarity to move quickly across characters and timelines.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
27 May 2014 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
75*
O'Sullivan finds the film witty, beautifully acted, and still ahead of its superhero competition, despite some confusing plotting. She praises the prison-break set piece but faults the underwritten Mystique, whose striking presence is not matched by a developed inner life.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
12 May 2014 · David Rooney
75*
Rooney finds the film vigorously entertaining, though more dramatically diffuse than its predecessor and lacking a definitive villain. He especially praises Evan Peters’ Quicksilver, whose playful performance and brilliantly staged Pentagon sequence stand out.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
22 May 2014 · Peter Bradshaw
70*
Bradshaw finds the film chaotic but ultimately enjoyable, a dizzying ride that mostly escapes incoherence. He particularly praises Quicksilver’s exuberant, bullet-time Pentagon sequence, while noting that the later sections become muddled and portentous.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
23 May 2014 · David Edelstein
70*
Edelstein finds it a successful, entertaining superhero movie, though its commercial purpose and weak climax hold it back. He especially praises Jennifer Lawrence’s performance as Mystique, while also singling out the Quicksilver sequence as a standout set piece.
Read the full review →The URL identifies this as a RogerEbert.com review, but the page content is blocked. Its verdict and any specific praise or criticism cannot be verified.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
12 May 2014 · Tim Grierson
65*
The critic’s verdict cannot be determined from the accessible page. The paywall also hides what the review singles out for praise or complaint.
Read the full review →The capsule presents the film as entertaining, mixing apocalyptic stakes with wit and playful effects. It particularly praises the 3-D set pieces and Jennifer Lawrence’s screen presence.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
12 May 2014 · ★★★ · Cath Clarke
60
The three-star rating suggests a mixed verdict. The available description pokes fun at Fassbender’s silly headgear, but the review text is unavailable to confirm further details.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
22 May 2014 · ★★/4 · Chris Cabin
50
Cabin finds the film weighed down by uninventive parallel storylines and emotionally hollow dialogue. He singles out Quicksilver’s Pentagon escape as a lively sequence that captures the characters’ wit and powers.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
23 May 2014 · ★★★★½ · David Crow
90
Crow calls the film a franchise miracle and possibly the best X-Men movie, praising its ambitious storytelling and character work. He singles out James McAvoy’s performance as Xavier as the film’s emotional heart.
Read the full review →P
Paste
23 May 2014 · 8.5 · Scott Wold
82*
Wold praises the film as an ambitious, entertaining blockbuster that balances its sprawling story with genuine heart. He singles out Singer’s skill at managing the large cast and complex plot while giving the characters’ themes room to breathe.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
13 May 2014 · ★★★★ · Amon Warmann
80
The critic calls it one of the year’s best blockbusters and arguably the franchise’s best installment. They praise the strong central performances and the character-focused story, while noting some lapses in the future timeline’s urgency.
Read the full review →C
Collider
22 May 2014 · B · Matt Goldberg
77
Goldberg finds the film uplifting and a strong return to form for the franchise, despite some shortcomings in action, visuals, and pacing. He especially praises its emphasis on empathy and Quicksilver’s standout action scene.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
12 May 2014 · Simon Reynolds
75*
The critic finds it an ambitious, entertaining entry that combines spectacle with strong performances, though the stakes sometimes feel too low. Evan Peters’s Quicksilver sequence is singled out as a standout action highlight.
Read the full review →/
/Film
23 May 2014 · 7.5/10 · Russ Fischer
75
Fischer calls it a speedy, character-oriented action film and one of the better X-Men movies. He praises the clear, energetic editing and Quicksilver’s memorable action sequence, while noting an ending that complicates earlier films’ emotional victories.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
22 May 2014 · Michael Pattison
65*
Pattison finds the film enjoyable overall, despite several pointed reservations. He singles out the chemistry among the ensemble and the lively, comparatively restrained action sequences for praise.
Read the full review →The URL identifies this as a review of the 2014 film, but the page content is blocked. The critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be determined.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
12 May 2014 · Alonso Duralde
55*
The critic finds the film entertaining but ultimately more exhausting than exuberant and not fully satisfying on its own. They praise Quicksilver’s action sequence and Singer’s brisk handling of the sprawling story, while faulting the imbalance created by the bleak future scenes.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate