Critics’ reviews

Young Sherlock Holmes (1985)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 64: 2 positive, 5 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Young Sherlock Holmes

64
Positive
2
Mixed
5
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards qualified approval, with praise clustering around the young leads and the film’s atmosphere. Nicholas Rowe’s Holmes and the Holmes–Watson pairing earn favourable notices, while the production design helps sell this imagined early adventure. The more enthusiastic responses value its affection for the Holmes stories and its willingness to make a family adventure dark. Eye for Film particularly praises Bruce Broughton’s gothic score and argues that the film deserves greater recognition.

Reservations concern familiarity, uneven action direction and how far the spectacle pulls the film away from traditional Holmes territory. Empire enjoys the hallucinatory effects but finds the direction less assured once the action begins. Variety offers the sharpest dissent, praising the young performers while finding that visual effects take priority over artistry. The spread is wide, though three entries lack accessible verdicts, limiting how confidently their positions can be described.

Slant Magazine
3 December 2003 · ★★★/4 · Josh Vasquez
75

Vasquez finds the film an affectionate, largely successful attempt to honor the Sherlock Holmes legend. He praises Nicholas Rowe’s performance and the restrained handling of young Holmes’s first love, while noting the film borrows from Indiana Jones.

Read the full review →
Empire
2 March 2006 · Olly Richards
65*

Richards finds it entertaining but familiar, with direction that falters once the action begins. He praises the young leads’ pairing and the dazzling effects that bring the hallucinatory scenes to life.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 December 1985 · Janet Maslin
65*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be verified. The available page information identifies a New York Times film article about the matching 1985 title.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
· Roger Ebert
64*

The review text was inaccessible, so its verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint could be verified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· RR
64*

The available metadata identifies this as a review but does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its standfirst frames Holmes’s apocryphal early life as the peg for an adventure, but cuts off before offering specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
60

Hutchinson finds the young Holmes-and-Watson origin story commendable, though some Holmes aficionados may miss the traditional atmosphere. He praises the production design as fabulous.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1984 · Variety Staff
35*

The review finds the film commercially effective but not artistic. It praises the young leads’ performances while faulting the production’s emphasis on visual effects.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
20 December 2005 · Gator MacReady
88*

MacReady gives the film an enthusiastic endorsement, arguing it deserves greater recognition as a dark, imaginative family adventure. He particularly praises Bruce Broughton’s gothic score and the film’s atmospheric production values.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate