Critics’ reviews

1923 (2022)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 72: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of 1923

72
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics find 1923 promising, with praise centred on Harrison Ford and Helen Mirren rather than the sprawling plotting. Their chemistry and authority give the family drama its strongest footing, while Mirren’s commanding presence draws particular approval. Aminah Nieves also earns recognition, and the more enthusiastic reviews praise the cinematic direction and visual scale. The balance is positive, though much of that approval rests on the premiere’s potential.

The main reservation is that the separate storylines do not always cohere, with some critics finding the drama emotionally underdeveloped or overly familiar. The Indigenous boarding-school material divides opinion: /Film finds Teonna’s story compelling and unflinching, while The AV Club worries that the school scenes risk becoming gratuitous. The Hollywood Reporter offers the most guarded assessment, questioning the diffuse pilot despite Ford’s performance. IndieWire’s later season review is substantially warmer, finding empathy and dignity connecting the scattered stories.

IndieWire
16 March 2025 · A- · Christian Blauvelt
90

The critic praises the season as an ambitious, thrillingly cinematic epic, despite its sprawling storylines not always hanging together. He singles out the cinematic direction and production values, along with Sheridan’s ability to connect disparate storylines through empathy and dignity.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
18 December 2022 · B · Max Gao
77

The review finds the prequel promising, with Harrison Ford and Helen Mirren elevating it through strong performances. It praises their magnetic screen presence, while noting that some storylines feel disconnected and the school scenes risk being gratuitous.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 December 2022 · Joshua Alston
70*

Alston finds the series promising, with its marquee leads elevating the Yellowstone spinoff despite an uneven pilot. He praises Helen Mirren and Harrison Ford’s chemistry, while noting that the separate storylines feel disconnected.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 December 2022 · Adrian Horton
65*

The critic finds the premiere promising but not yet emotionally specific, with enough reasons to keep watching. They praise Harrison Ford’s compelling gravitas and single out Aminah Nieves’s performance, while expressing concern about the show’s depiction of violence against Indigenous characters.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
16 December 2022 · Daniel Fienberg
50*

The critic finds the pilot uneven and its future uncertain, though the Dutton-centered material is watchable. He praises Ford’s performance and Richardson’s visual command, while criticizing the diffuse plot and the Africa and boarding-school storylines.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
18 December 2022 · ★★★★ · Michael Winn Johnson
80

The premiere is a strong start that introduces intriguing characters and storylines, though one rivalry feels overly familiar. The critic especially praises Helen Mirren’s commanding performance as Cara.

Read the full review →
/Film
16 December 2022 · Barry Levitt
75*

The critic finds the premiere promising and says it won them over, despite familiar Western territory. They especially praise Teonna’s storyline for its compelling and unflinching portrayal of Indigenous mistreatment.

Read the full review →
Collider
23 March 2025 · 7/10 · Michael John Petty
70

Petty finds the episode slower but sees it regrouping and potentially building momentum. He praises the intersecting storylines, while criticizing how much hardship Alex endures.

Read the full review →
Paste
16 December 2022 · Lacy Baugher Milas
70*

The review finds the series promising as a messy family drama, though its scattered storylines make the premiere difficult to judge. It particularly praises the chemistry between Harrison Ford and Helen Mirren, singling out Mirren’s performance as compelling.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate