Critics’ reviews

Big Little Lies (2017)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 72: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Big Little Lies

72
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics like it, and the praise falls in two places. The first is the cast: Witherspoon and Kidman are named again and again, with the wider ensemble credited for giving depth to women who could have been types. The second is Jean-Marc Vallée’s direction, which several reviews say takes a soapy premise about wealthy Monterey mothers judging one another’s parenting and makes it darker and more serious than it needs to be. The murder mystery and the gossipy police interviews are treated as the hook rather than the point; what the reviews respond to is the friendship, the resentment and the violence underneath the money.

The reservations are few and mostly mild. Vulture finds the elliptical structure overused, trading suspense for surprise, and The Times admits the world on show is vacuous even while finding truth in it. The one clear dissent is The Hollywood Reporter, which calls the melodrama annoying, the confrontations contrived and the chorus of gossiping parents too much. Otherwise the spread is narrow.

Variety
8 February 2017 · Sonia Saraiya
90*

Vallée’s direction elevates the pulpy material into a satisfying exploration of wealthy suburban life, trauma, and gender dynamics, with strong performances from Witherspoon and Kidman. The mystery structure and character depth make the inevitable catastrophe watchable rather than a simple whodunit.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
8.4/10 · Kasia Delgado
84

The series initially appears to focus on bitter, rich women in an ultra-wealthy Californian seaside town who judge each other’s parenting, but ultimately celebrates female friendship amid horror. It frames the central murder mystery through gossipy police interviews with parents.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 March 2017
80*

The critic praises this fabulous adaptation of Liane Moriarty’s bestseller as going beyond Desperate Housewives territory with a satisfying darkness. It highlights the power struggles, jealousies and underlying flaws among the wealthy Monterey mothers, building inexorably toward death.

Read the full review →
Vulture
14 February 2017 · Matt Zoller Seitz
75*

The critic finds the series an addictive social satire and murder mystery with strong performances, especially from the lead actresses who bring depth to their characters. The elliptical storytelling prioritizes surprise over suspense and sometimes feels overused, but the acting makes it a must-see.

Read the full review →
The Times
14 March 2017 · ★★★★☆
70*

The critic finds depth, class and humour in this glossy drama set in Monterey Bay despite its vacuous moneyed world, noting a truthful ring of quiet desperation beneath the lifestyle soap elements and strong performances.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
7 February 2017 · Tim Goodman
30*

The soapy melodrama is more annoying than entertaining, relying on contrived confrontations, an over-the-top Greek chorus of gossipy parents, and a lack of subtlety or realism despite its marquee cast. It reduces to clichéd rich white people problems badly told.

Read the full review →
Collider
16 February 2017 · ★★★★ · Allison Keene
80

The critic finds the miniseries an easy and engrossing watch thanks to its A-list cast delivering strong performances and Jean-Marc Vallée’s sumptuous direction that creates a dreamlike yet nightmarish world. They single out the compelling exploration of consent, violence, and personal resentments beneath the surface satire of privileged lives.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
17 February 2017 · Alison Herman
70*

The miniseries succeeds as pointed satire of West Coast wealth and the narcissism of small differences among the rich. It excels by exploring the petty infighting and insecurities of its female characters rather than relying on the murder-mystery hook.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate