Critics’ reviews

Bridgerton (2020)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 81: 12 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Bridgerton

81
Positive
12
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics welcome Bridgerton as a pleasurable, knowingly modern Regency romance, with twelve of the thirteen reviews positive. Praise centres on the costumes, lavish settings and inclusive casting, alongside the frank treatment of sex and female desire. The reviews also find substance beneath the gloss: several praise the feminist attention to marriage and women’s choices, while others emphasise the romantic chemistry, emotional depth and brisk storytelling. Escapism is the clearest point of agreement.

Reservations concern how much polish and exaggeration the romance can sustain. The Guardian finds the dialogue excessive and the plotting crowded with clichés, yet still finds the series addictive. The Times is the lone negative voice, objecting to a Regency England scrubbed too clean and finding the result insufficiently sexy or grounded. The spread is therefore wide, but the disagreement is concentrated: most critics enjoy the glossy fantasy that the strongest dissenter finds unconvincing.

Radio Times
22 December 2020 · ★★★★★ · Eleanor Bley Griffiths
100

The critic calls the series an utter joy and a fun cross between Gossip Girl and Jane Austen set in a fantasy Regency London. She singles out the frank handling of sex and self-pleasure as well as the sumptuous visuals and costumes for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
21 December 2020 · Caroline Framke
90*

The critic describes the show as a confectionary treat that mixes Regency romance tropes with Shondaland sensibilities for a swoony, modern take. She singles out the inclusive casting and the explicit, insightful exploration of sex and desire as standout elements.

Read the full review →
Vulture
21 December 2020
90*

The critic praises the series as a heady, inviting fantasy of pleasure and true love that expands the romance genre with inclusive casting while delivering sparkling momentum and escapism.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
22 December 2020 · Ann Donahue
85*

The critic calls the series a fizzy, ebullient period romance that's easy to love and arrives at just the right time after a difficult year.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
22 December 2020
80*

The review calls it a glossy Downton Abbey replacement and pleasingly OTT exercise in escapism with a diverse cast and enlightened heroines. It singles out the lavish production and modern spin on Regency romance for praise.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
21 December 2020 · Inkoo Kang
80*

The critic calls it a delectably smart confection that weaves feminist critique through the marriage plot. She singles out the observations on patriarchal traditions and their effects on female characters, along with the believable obstacles in the central romance.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
24 December 2020 · ★★★★
80

The review praises the sumptuous costumes, glorious backdrops and modern take on Regency romance as fun, frivolous and frothy escapism perfect for Christmas. It singles out the diverse casting and fully imagined world for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 December 2020 · Lucy Mangan
70*

The critic finds the series preposterous and cliché-ridden yet moreish and addictive, leaving viewers wanting more despite its flaws. They single out the over-the-top dialogue and Downton Abbey influences for complaint while noting its escapist appeal.

Read the full review →
The Times
26 December 2020 · Hugo Rifkind
40*

The critic describes a vision of Regency England that is excessively clean and polished, falling between stools as neither stolid like Downton Abbey nor sexy enough like Harlots. They single out the American-influenced glossy adaptation and lack of grit for complaint.

Read the full review →
Collider
25 December 2020 · A- · Liz Shannon Miller
90

The critic praises the series as a delightfully horny and addictive Regency romance that knows exactly what it is and delivers on it with modern twists, beautiful costumes, and strong performances. She singles out the show's frank treatment of sexuality and its blend of escapism with emotional depth for praise.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
22 December 2020 · ★★★★½ · Amanda-Rae Prescott
90

The critic finds that the series redefines period romance on TV with concise storytelling, strong character development, big-budget aesthetics, and standout diversity that sets a new standard.

Read the full review →
Paste
21 December 2020 · 9.0 · Lacy Baugher Milas
90*

The critic calls the series pure swoony joy and a delightful bit of escapism that feels like exactly the right show for the moment, with wonderful chemistry, a feminist thread, and a female-centered approach to sex and romance. She singles out the vibrant costumes, anachronistic pop score, and diverse casting for praise.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
23 December 2020 · Alison Herman
80*

The critic calls Bridgerton an escapist delight that mixes Regency-era melodrama with modern explicitness. She praises its bingeable quality and the escapist fantasy of the close-knit family amid a difficult year.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate