Critics’ reviews

Daisy Jones & the Six (2023)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 57: 6 positive, 4 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Daisy Jones & the Six

57
Positive
6
Mixed
4
Negative
5

The reviews of Daisy Jones & the Six are sharply divided, with praise concentrated on the performances and music rather than the storytelling. Riley Keough is the most consistently admired presence, and her chemistry with Sam Claflin gives several critics a reason to stay with familiar material. The songs and scenes of the band performing also win approval across otherwise conflicting reviews. Period costumes and production design attract praise, though the polish becomes a sticking point.

The main disagreement is over how much those strengths compensate for thin supporting characters, familiar plotting and awkward documentary-style interviews. Enthusiastic reviews find an entertaining, accessible band drama; detractors find it too sanitised to make the musicians convincing. Even the central relationship divides opinion: IndieWire finds the romance unconvincing, while The Ringer identifies the love-triangle scenes as a particular strength. The spread is wide, with little agreement on whether the musical appeal is enough.

The AV Club
1 March 2023 · B+ · Mary Kate Carr
83

The AV Club finds the miniseries a crowd-pleasing, straightforwardly good time despite familiar plot turns and flaws in its mockumentary format. It praises the electric chemistry between Riley Keough and Sam Claflin, along with the show’s music and ’70s-era production design.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
1 March 2023 · ★★★★ · Vicky Jessop
80

Jessop calls the series a fun, breezy ride that breaks little new ground but remains entertaining. She praises Riley Keough’s performance and the smoky, guitar-heavy music, while criticizing the forced interview segments and underdeveloped storylines.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
3 March 2023 · Morgan Cormack
70*

Cormack finds the series enjoyable and easy to binge, though its story feels familiar. The catchy tunes are a particular strength.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 March 2023 · Daniel D'Addario
68*

The series is flawed but compelling, and well worth watching as a showcase for its two leads. The critic especially praises Riley Keough’s magnetic performance, while faulting the ensemble’s lack of texture and the show’s antiseptic feel.

Read the full review →
Empire
3 March 2023 · Sophie Butcher
65*

Butcher finds the series solid but slightly underwhelming, with its glossy presentation and rushed storytelling blunting its emotional impact. She praises the cast’s musical commitment, especially the magic of Keough and Claflin performing together.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
1 March 2023 · Angie Han
50*

The critic finds the series enjoyable but too polished and lacking in urgency and rock ’n’ roll edge. She praises Riley Keough’s electric performance and the show’s period costumes, locations, and music.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
1 March 2023 · D · Ben Travers
37

Travers gives the series a harsh verdict, finding its documentary framing and central romance unconvincing. He singles out the music as a rare bright spot, though only a limited one.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 March 2023 · Lucy Mangan
30*

Mangan finds the series glossy and entertaining but ultimately too slick and sanitary to bring the band to life. She praises the chemistry between Keough and Claflin, while finding the screen version less compelling than the book.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
1 March 2023 · Emily Baker
30*

Baker finds the series a shallow, slow-moving adaptation that falls short of its potential. She singles out the original songs and soundtrack as its saving grace.

Read the full review →
Vulture
1 March 2023 · Roxana Hadadi
30*

Hadadi finds the series enjoyable but ultimately too small and narrowly focused on romance. She praises the cast’s chemistry and the scenes showing how the band develops its music, while criticizing the thin world-building and sidelining of other band members.

Read the full review →
Paste
1 March 2023 · 8.5/10 · Anna Govert
85

Govert finds the series highly entertaining despite its awkward documentary-style framing and uneven ending. She especially praises the central performances and the convincing musical performances.

Read the full review →
Consequence
1 March 2023 · Mary Siroky
75*

Siroky’s review is positive about the adaptation. She particularly praises the inspired casting, especially the chemistry between Riley Keough and Sam Claflin.

Read the full review →
/Film
1 March 2023 · Shania Russell
70*

Russell finds the series electrifying overall, though its melodramatic ending undermines much of what came before. She singles out Riley Keough’s magnetic performance as Daisy for praise.

Read the full review →
Collider
1 March 2023 · C · Maggie Boccella
57

Boccella finds the adaptation flat, slow, and emotionally diminished compared with the novel. She praises the catchy songs and the band’s most vibrant 1970s performance moments.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
6 March 2023 · Alison Herman
30*

Herman finds the series weighed down by familiar clichés and an adaptation that loses the novel’s distinctive perspective. She praises the conflicted love-triangle scenes, where the characters feel most fully realized.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate