Critics’ reviews

Gilmore Girls (2000)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 82: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Gilmore Girls

82
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Every one of the seven reviews is favourable, and they agree on why. The praise clusters on Amy Sherman-Palladino’s dialogue, which most critics describe as fast, dense with pop-culture references and smarter than the small-town setting suggests, and on the mother-daughter relationship at its centre, with Lauren Graham singled out more than once. Stars Hollow itself gets nearly as much credit: several reviews treat the town and its supporting cast as the reason the series rewards rewatching.

The spread is narrow, from good to very good, and no review dissents outright. The reservations concern the later years rather than the early ones. Den of Geek and /Film both place the second season at the peak and find the later seasons losing their spark, with /Film calling the plotting contrived. Variety, reviewing the 2016 revival, notes structural problems and too much fan service. Readers should also note that several of these reviews cover that revival rather than the original run.

The Hollywood Reporter
24 November 2016 · Ray Richmond
90*

The original review hails the pilot as a genuine gem, fresh and real family drama with sparkling chemistry between Lorelai and Rory, smart writing by Amy Sherman-Palladino, and quirky characters. Praises the authentic mother-daughter relationship and heart.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
25 November 2016 · Eleanor Bley Griffiths
85*

The critic describes it as a glorious, comforting return that preserves the feel, quick-fire dialogue, and complex female relationships, with raw emotion around grief. Singles out the performances and humor amid nostalgia and drama.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 November 2016 · Maureen Ryan
80*

The critic finds the revival comforting TV, praising the return of the witty dialogue and strong performances, especially Lauren Graham's, while noting some structural issues and overindulgence in fan service. They single out the emotional depth in family relationships and grief over Richard's death.

Read the full review →
Empire
18 November 2016 · Helen O'Hara
75*

The review calls it one of the fastest-talking, smartest shows, with wit, warmth, and meat in the relationships. Praises the return of the cast and the pleasure of the small-town setting and dialogue, noting it grapples with aging but remains enjoyable.

Read the full review →
Paste
7 October 2025 · Gillian Bennett
85*

The critic celebrates Gilmore Girls' lasting appeal 25 years on, praising its sharp pop-culture-laden dialogue, timeless focus on both adult and teen perspectives, and the cozy community of Stars Hollow as key to its rewatch value. The series' strong friendships and escapist qualities are highlighted as particularly resonant amid modern life's pace.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
10 February 2026 · Kirsten Howard
80*

The critic ranks all seasons of the series, praising its cozy small-town charm, rapid-fire witty dialogue, and emotionally honest family and romantic relationships while noting that no episodes are truly bad thanks to the delightful supporting cast. Season 2 is ranked highest for deepening characters and flaws, while later seasons are critiqued for losing spark or uneven pacing.

Read the full review →
/Film
10 June 2024 · Caroline Madden
75*

The critic ranks the seasons of Gilmore Girls, highlighting its rapid-fire witty dialogue, quaint charm, and strong mother-daughter bond as enduring strengths. Season 2 is singled out as the peak for its engaging love triangle and small-town quirks, while later seasons and the revival are critiqued for contrived plots and lost spark.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate