I Will Find You (2026)

The critic says it knocks it out of the park as another wild and fun Harlan Coben crime thriller, a gripping immersive tale of parental love, loss and obsession. They single out the dizzying, captivating experience with twists that keep viewers focused on the obvious while intricate elements unfold.

The critic calls it a fast-paced, throwaway conspiracy thriller that knows exactly what it is and moves briskly enough to keep viewers hooked despite the silliness. They single out the bickering FBI partners Chi McBride and Logan Browning as the standout MVPs who could anchor a spin-off.

The critic finds the series silly and unbelievable with breakneck twists that strain credibility, but praises its zippy, moreish addictive quality and strong action set pieces as perfect undemanding summer viewing. They single out the sincere performances of Sam Worthington and Britt Lower for making the nonsense watchable.

The critic calls it classic small-screen Harlan Coben: maddeningly watchable crap with bells on. The script is made of Play-Doh and the protagonists are flaps of luncheon meat, yet the reviewer keeps watching to the end despite the red herrings, plot holes and preposterous twists.

The critic finds it rubbish yet addictive, a formulaic and preposterous Netflix thriller full of cliffhangers, rug pulls and the stupidest plot reveal in living memory. Worthington is the right action-hero lead and the red herrings keep viewers hooked through all eight episodes.

The critic finds the series so bad it's almost good, calling it an absurd conspiracy thriller with an over-the-top plot that stretches credulity. They single out the ludicrous conspiracy and contrived developments as the main elements highlighted for complaint.

The critic describes it as a disposable, wheel-spinning pulpy thriller built for distracted viewing, with repetition and illogical resolutions but generally watchable thanks to a top-notch cast. They single out the bickering law enforcement procedural subplot featuring Chi McBride and Logan Browning as the best element.

The critic calls the show ridiculous and designed for second-screen viewing, with contrived plotting, one-dimensional characters, and stiff performances that make it an inorganic mess. They single out the silly twists, exposition-heavy dialogue, and lack of emotional depth as key complaints.

The critic calls it irredeemably awful, an overcranked feast of absolute nonsense with ludicrous twists, DNA swapping, Swiss orphans and mad accents that turns the brain to soup. It is also completely irresistible in its bombardment of plot and thinly sketched characters.

The review finds the series doesn't break the mold but will still satisfy fans of Harlan Coben adaptations, praising its straightforward suspenseful style, solid twists that pay off logically, and strong cast chemistry while noting some pacing and generic character issues. They single out the well-executed twists and cliffhangers that feel satisfying without cheap tricks as a highlight.

The critic argues the series proves Coben has gone too far with twists, delivering a flat, skippable watch with clunky exposition, awkward chemistry, and clichés that undermine tension. They single out the over-extended twists and lack of finesse in the narrative as the main complaints.

The critic calls the latest Harlan Coben adaptation more of the ludicrous same, with a mountain of plot holes and a rollicking but silly pace that works best if viewers switch their brains off. They single out the fast pace that helps overlook the implausibilities as the main element keeping it watchable.