Most critics agree on where Lanterns works: the mismatched partnership between Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre, whose prickly chemistry is praised almost universally, with the supporting ensemble close behind. The grounded, buddy-cop approach and the decision to favour human cost over spectacle are counted as strengths by the majority, and several reviews find the mystery emotionally tangible. The reservations cluster around two things. First, debt: Variety calls the series overly derivative of Watchmen and True Detective, and Vulture finds its identity unmoored as it shifts between comic-book action and grim prestige drama. Second, structure: the flashbacks and interlocking timelines are described as disjointed more than once. The scored reviews sit in a narrow band, mostly positive with a couple mixed, but the British papers dissent sharply: the Guardian finds it dull and flat, and the Telegraph calls it a muddled mess that buries good performances under an overcomplicated plot.
The critic praises the prickly chemistry between Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre and the supporting ensemble, noting that the series transcends its superhero elements through engaging ideas and strong performances despite some uneven moments. The grounded, character-driven approach and buddy-cop dynamic are singled out for praise.
Read the full review →