Critics’ reviews

Lanterns (2026)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 73: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Lanterns

73
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics agree on where Lanterns works: the mismatched partnership between Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre, whose prickly chemistry is praised almost universally, with the supporting ensemble close behind. The grounded, buddy-cop approach and the decision to favour human cost over spectacle are counted as strengths by the majority, and several reviews find the mystery emotionally tangible. The reservations cluster around two things. First, debt: Variety calls the series overly derivative of Watchmen and True Detective, and Vulture finds its identity unmoored as it shifts between comic-book action and grim prestige drama. Second, structure: the flashbacks and interlocking timelines are described as disjointed more than once. The scored reviews sit in a narrow band, mostly positive with a couple mixed, but the British papers dissent sharply: the Guardian finds it dull and flat, and the Telegraph calls it a muddled mess that buries good performances under an overcomplicated plot.

The Hollywood Reporter
14 August 2026 · Daniel Fienberg
80*

The critic praises the prickly chemistry between Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre and the supporting ensemble, noting that the series transcends its superhero elements through engaging ideas and strong performances despite some uneven moments. The grounded, character-driven approach and buddy-cop dynamic are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
14 August 2026 · B · Dennis Perkins
77

The critic praises the earthbound drama and the simmering conflict between leads Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre in this somber superhero police procedural. It draws from True Detective influences but focuses heavily on human trauma and the cost of power rather than spectacle.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 August 2026 · Alison Herman
65*

The critic finds the lead performances by Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre compelling in their mismatched partnership and character studies, but criticizes the series for being overly derivative of other HBO shows like Watchmen and True Detective, failing to fully transcend its influences. The focus on the nature of assigned power and racial dynamics in John's story is highlighted positively.

Read the full review →
Vulture
14 August 2026 · Kathryn VanArendonk
60*

The series struggles with an unmoored identity, shifting between comic-book spectacle, grim prestige drama, and multiple interlocking storylines with frequent flashbacks. It remains engaging and not dull thanks to strong performances (especially Kyle Chandler) and occasional weird or thoughtful flourishes.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 August 2026

The critic finds the DC series a bust and a lot of meh despite its alien-hunting premise and buddy-cop structure across timelines. The show works hard with moments but feels dull and flat overall.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
17 August 2026

The critic calls the HBO series a muddled mess of superhero nonsense that buries strong performances beneath an overcomplicated plot and fails to deliver on its True Detective aspirations.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
14 August 2026 · Daniel Chin
80*

The critic views Lanterns as a refreshing, grounded addition to the DCU that benefits from strong lead performances and chemistry between Hal Jordan and John Stewart. The series stands out for blending superhero elements with an emotionally tangible mystery story set across multiple timelines.

Read the full review →
Consequence
14 August 2026 · B
77

The review highlights the strong cast performances, especially Chandler and Pierre, and the HBO-style grounded crime drama approach, while noting some disjointed storytelling from flashbacks.

Read the full review →
/Film
14 August 2026 · 7.5/10 · Jeremy Mathai
75

The critic praises the grounded buddy-cop dynamic between Hal Jordan and John Stewart and the blend of True Detective-style mystery with superhero elements, but notes it may divide fans expecting more comic-book spectacle.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate