Critics’ reviews

Lessons in Chemistry (2023)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 62: 3 positive, 8 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Lessons in Chemistry

62
Positive
3
Mixed
8
Negative
2

Most critics find Lessons in Chemistry pleasant, handsome and easy to watch, and most stop short of recommending it without qualification: three reviews are warm, eight sit in the middle and two are cold. The praise clusters on Brie Larson, whose dry, idiosyncratic Elizabeth Zott is singled out by almost every review, with several also enjoying her pairing with Lewis Pullman. Aja Naomi King draws the most consistent secondary praise as Harriet Sloane, and the 1950s setting and the cooking-show scenes are regularly noted as the parts that come alive.

The reservations are about shape rather than execution: too gentle, too polished, too many storylines, politics drawn too simply. Several critics feel Harriet’s story is sidelined. The spread is wide. The i Paper and Collider rate it highly; Vulture finds it inert; Den of Geek objects almost entirely to the handling of the dog, Six-Thirty, whose narration is largely cut, a decision The Guardian applauds.

The i Paper
13 October 2023 · Marianne Levy
90*

Levy calls the adaptation a resounding success, with only occasional missteps. She especially praises Brie Larson’s nuanced, magnetic performance and the series’ vivid presentation.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
29 September 2023 · Angie Han
70*

Han finds the series imperfect but enjoyable, praising its endearing cast, witty dialogue, and accessible themes. She especially singles out Brie Larson’s open, dryly humorous performance, while criticizing the simplistic politics and uneven subplots.

Read the full review →
Empire
13 October 2023 · Sophie Butcher
65*

The review finds the series affecting and worthwhile, though overly gentle and sometimes sentimental. It praises Brie Larson’s performance and the richly realised period setting, while noting that the cooking scenes are especially absorbing.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 October 2023 · Lucy Mangan
65*

Mangan finds the series wholly enjoyable and highly watchable, but ultimately feels it wastes an opportunity to offer something fresh. She praises Aja Naomi King’s charismatic performance and the decision to largely remove the talking dog.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 October 2023 · Alison Herman
65*

Herman finds the series uneven but sees it as a welcome showcase for Brie Larson. She especially praises Larson’s idiosyncratic performance and her affecting chemistry with Lewis Pullman.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
9 October 2023 · C+ · Meredith Hobbs Coons
63

The review finds the series an enjoyable, feel-good adaptation that remains somewhat under-seasoned. It especially praises Aja Naomi King’s fully realized portrayal of Harriet Sloane and her compelling storyline.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
12 October 2023 · ★★★ · Vicky Jessop
60

Jessop finds the series enjoyable but too polished and underdone to make a lasting impression. She praises Brie Larson’s performance and the show’s gorgeous visuals, while criticizing its predictable story and bluntly drawn characters.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
11 October 2023 · Morgan Cormack
60*

The review suggests the series is engaging but somewhat muddled. It praises Brie Larson’s captivating performance while noting the tale feels slightly muddled.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
13 October 2023 · C- · Ben Travers
50

Travers finds the series muddled and exasperating, unable to balance its romance with its other storylines. He praises the central romance, noting that Brie Larson and Lewis Pullman make a cute pair.

Read the full review →
Vulture
13 October 2023 · Jen Chaney
30*

Chaney finds the series handsome and entertaining but ultimately inert and insufficiently challenging. She praises Aja Naomi King’s warmth and quiet power as Harriet, while faulting the show for sidelining her story and yielding screen time to a dog’s point of view.

Read the full review →
Collider
29 September 2023 · 9/10 · Carly Lane
90

The review finds the series rewarding and praises Brie Larson’s dynamic portrayal of Elizabeth Zott. It also highlights the central romance, while noting that Harriet’s story initially lacks independence and equal weight.

Read the full review →
Paste
11 October 2023 · 6.9/10 · Kaiya Shunyata
69

Shunyata finds the series weighed down by too many storylines and an unclear focus, despite its strong beginning. Brie Larson’s performance and Elizabeth’s journey from chemist to cooking-show host stand out as its strengths.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
27 October 2023 · Erin Qualey
30*

The critic finds the series’ treatment of Six-Thirty frustrating and inconsistent. She praises B.J. Novak’s voice performance but objects to the loss of the dog’s narration and changes that make him seem responsible for Calvin’s death.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate