Critics’ reviews

Ludwig (2024)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 80: 9 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Ludwig

80
Positive
9
Mixed
1
Negative
0

The reviews are warm and closely aligned. Most critics say the series is built around David Mitchell and that the fit is exact: an anxious, puzzle-obsessed introvert who becomes a detective by accident, played squarely to type. The praise clusters on the script, which critics call sharp and funny rather than twee, and on the puzzle-framing of each case, which several say lifts the show above a standard procedural. The supporting cast is mentioned approvingly across the board, and Anna Maxwell Martin’s chemistry with Mitchell is singled out more than once.

Where reservations appear, they cluster on mildness. Several critics find it gentle and low-stakes, and The Times suggests it is sometimes too mild for Mitchell’s talents. Radio Times notes it grows more generic once it settles into a case-of-the-week rhythm, and The i Paper thinks Maxwell Martin is underused. The spread is narrow: nine positive, one mixed, none negative. The one qualified verdict, from Den of Geek, still calls it satisfying.

The Telegraph
25 September 2024 · ★★★★★ · Anita Singh
100

David Mitchell plays brilliantly to type in this quirky, cosy crime series. It is escapist and witty without being twee, lifted by strong supporting performances and inventive plotting.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
21 September 2024
89*

The series is a perfect showcase for David Mitchell playing to type as an awkward puzzle-setter turned detective. It stands out for its sharp script, cinematic style, and genuinely funny tone in a cosy crime format.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
23 September 2024 · ★★★★ · James Hibbs
80

The critic praises David Mitchell's perfect fit for the role in this comedy-drama detective series, highlighting the fun absurd premise and strong cast, while noting it becomes more generic as it settles into the case-of-the-week format.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
20 March 2025 · B · Tim Lowery
77

A funny and delightful case-of-the-week dramedy that makes Mitchell the perfect lead as an awkward, sweet nerd solving crimes with puzzle logic.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
25 September 2024 · Nick Duerden
70*

The critic finds the series charming and well-suited to David Mitchell as an accidental detective in a cosy crime caper, praising the neat premise and guest stars but noting it is light and PG, with Anna Maxwell Martin underused.

Read the full review →
The Times
25 September 2024 · Carol Midgley
70*

The show is an amiable, low-stakes crime mystery with David Mitchell perfectly cast as a nerdish introvert. It feels gentle and cosy, carried by strong chemistry with Anna Maxwell Martin but sometimes too mild for his talents.

Read the full review →
Collider
19 March 2025 · 9/10 · Maggie Boccella
90

The critic praises the puzzle-framing format that sets the series apart from standard procedurals and highlights David Mitchell’s nuanced, charming performance as the reclusive puzzle-maker turned detective, along with the strong supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
25 September 2024 · Rebecca Cook
80*

Tremendous fun as a cosy crime caper with a tremendous script and Mitchell's idiosyncratic delivery; the most fun you could have watching TV this autumn.

Read the full review →
Paste
17 March 2025 · 8.0 · Lacy Baugher Milas
80*

The critic finds the series offbeat and utterly charming, crediting its appeal to David Mitchell’s pitch-perfect lead performance and the talented ensemble that makes the silly premise warm-hearted and fun despite requiring suspension of disbelief.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
24 September 2024 · ★★★ · Louisa Mellor
60

A mild, unchallenging but satisfying cosy crime series that is precision-engineered for David Mitchell's anxious, puzzle-obsessed lead performance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate