Critics’ reviews

Modern Love (2019)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 60: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Modern Love

60
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
3

Most critics find the anthology charming and hopeful, a revival of the romantic comedy told in short, self-contained stories. The praise clusters on the acting, and on one episode above all: Anne Hathaway’s portrayal of a woman living with bipolar disorder is singled out by reviews at both ends of the scale as sensitive, raw and the strongest thing in the series. John Carney’s restrained direction and the natural performances it draws out also earn credit.

The reservations gather around schmaltz and privilege. Several reviews find the New York on show narrow and affluent, its romantic problems too comfortable to grip, and the cast short on everyday variety. The spread is wide. Three critics come down against it: Vulture calls it emotionally empty and retrograde, faulting shallow characterisation and a refusal to engage with the social forces shaping love; The Telegraph and Collider find it too polished or too contrived, while still admiring the acting. Digital Spy, reviewing later, is warmer about a single second-season story.

The i Paper
17 October 2019 · Sarah Carson
80*

Carson finds the anthology a charming, refreshing revival of the romantic comedy, despite its heavy schmaltz and lack of bite. She praises its thoughtful, diverse love stories for moving beyond familiar romcom formulas.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
8 October 2019 · Tim Goodman
78*

Goodman finds the anthology simple, endearing, and compelling, with most stories working well. He especially praises John Carney’s restrained direction and the natural performances it brings out.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
18 October 2019 · B · Gwen Ihnat
77

The review finds the anthology charming and ultimately hopeful, despite uneven episodes and a narrow, affluent portrayal of New York. It praises the series’ concise stories about unexpected human connection.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
18 October 2019 · Helen Brown
30*

Brown finds the series too polished and privileged to make its romantic problems compelling, despite its moments of emotional warmth. She praises the acting throughout, especially Anne Hathaway’s portrayal of a woman living with bipolar disorder.

Read the full review →
Vulture
22 October 2019 · Angelica Jade Bastién
10*

The critic finds the series emotionally empty and retrograde. She particularly faults its shallow characterization and its avoidance of the social dynamics shaping love and relationships.

Read the full review →
Paste
18 October 2019 · 8.9/10 · Amy Amatangelo
89

Amatangelo praises the series as delightful, poignant, and consistently stronger than much of television. She singles out its concise storytelling and Anne Hathaway’s intense portrayal of bipolar disorder.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
6 August 2021 · Abby Robinson
75*

The review finds the season’s featured story a charming, lovely addition to the anthology, though its conclusion may feel abrupt. It praises the leads’ complementary performances and the story’s whimsical score and vintage-film touches.

Read the full review →
NME
75*

The critic finds the series uplifting and warmly entertaining, though its schmaltz may not suit everyone. They single out Anne Hathaway’s episode for its sensitive, realistic portrayal of bipolar disorder, while criticizing the cast’s lack of everyday variety.

Read the full review →
Collider
18 October 2019 · ★★ · Adam Chitwood
40

The critic finds the anthology uneven and often contrived, though likely appealing to viewers seeking comfort-food romance. The Anne Hathaway episode earns particular praise for its emotionally raw depiction of bipolar disorder and her dynamic performance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate