Critics’ reviews

National Treasure (2016)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 73: 6 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of National Treasure

73
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics find National Treasure a compelling, uncomfortable drama, with praise concentrated on the performances and its treatment of celebrity, abuse allegations and their effects on a family. Robbie Coltrane’s complex, restrained performance draws repeated approval, while Julie Walters receives particular attention for Marie’s devastation and faltering certainty. The reviews generally value the series’ moral uncertainty and find its difficult subject matter handled with thought and care.

The reservations range from uneven storytelling to a more substantial objection about whose experience receives attention. Some critics find subplots underdeveloped or unwieldy, while assessments of pace differ: IndieWire notes sluggishness, whereas The Hollywood Reporter finds the drama brisk. The i Paper offers the clearest dissent, praising the leads but arguing that the victims have too little screen time or agency. The spread is largely favourable rather than sharply divided, though that criticism questions a central choice in the storytelling.

IndieWire
1 March 2017 · A- · Liz Shannon Miller
90

Miller calls the series important and vital viewing, despite some sluggish pacing and an unwieldy subplot. She praises Robbie Coltrane’s performance and Julie Walters’s portrayal of Marie’s devastation.

Read the full review →
Variety
27 February 2017 · Maureen Ryan
80*

Ryan finds the tightly focused drama suspenseful and impactful, despite a less developed subplot about Paul’s comedy partnership. She particularly praises the performances, especially Julie Walters’s portrayal of Marie as her certainty begins to crumble.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
20 September 2016 · Sam Wollaston
75*

Wollaston calls the drama thoughtful, bold and accomplished, while acknowledging that it is uncomfortable viewing. He particularly praises Robbie Coltrane’s complex, convincing performance and singles out Julie Walters and Andrea Riseborough as brilliant.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
1 March 2017 · Tim Goodman
75*

Goodman finds the series compelling and brisk, with a familiar subject handled in a fresh, meaningful way. He especially praises the nuanced performances and the way the drama explores the effects of celebrity and abuse allegations on a family.

Read the full review →
Vulture
1 March 2017 · Jen Chaney
70*

Chaney finds the four-part series engrossing and thought-provoking, with its moral uncertainty lingering after the finale. She praises the subdued performances, especially Robbie Coltrane’s, and the quietly ominous atmosphere.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
15 March 2019 · Ben Dowell
64*

The available description presents the finale as delivering a decisive verdict on Paul Finchley. It offers no specific praise or complaint about the episode.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
13 October 2016 · Hugh Montgomery
60*

The critic calls the series brave and important but argues that it marginalises the victims it aims to represent. He praises the lead performances while objecting to the victims’ limited screen time and lack of agency.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
27 September 2016 · Morgan Jeffery
70*

The episode is compelling and thought-provoking, though it offers no easy answers. The critic singles out the intense exchange between Paul’s wife and daughter, alongside Julie Walters’s performance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate