Critics’ reviews

Person of Interest (2011)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 69: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Person of Interest

69
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics are cautiously positive. The praise clusters on the premise, a surveillance machine and post-9/11 paranoia running through a network procedural, and on Michael Emerson, whom several reviews single out as the more compelling half of the central pair. The involvement of Jonathan Nolan and J.J. Abrams is cited as a reason to hope. Critics who assess the series as a whole rather than the pilot are warmer, and the later seasons, once the case-of-the-week format gives way to a serialised conspiracy, are where the admiration sits.

The reservations cluster on the pilot: a mediocre first case, familiar CBS procedural habits, and a Jim Caviezel who reads as emotionally distant. The spread is narrow, running from mixed to warm with no outright dismissals. Paste is the coolest, finding the idea interesting but the execution generic; Den of Geek, writing years later, is the warmest, arguing the show grows into one of the smartest on television.

The Hollywood Reporter
21 September 2011 · Tim Goodman
75*

The critic is hopeful that the series, with its strong creative team, can deliver interesting procedurals with serialized elements exploring privacy and paranoia. Highlights the compelling leads and visual style.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
23 September 2011 · B- · Zack Handlen
70

The pilot offers a high-concept premise about a surveillance machine that is intriguing but undermined by flat execution and uncharismatic lead performance from Jim Caviezel. Michael Emerson stands out as the more compelling half of the central duo, hinting at potential if the series leans into its weirder elements.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 September 2011 · Brian Lowry
60*

The critic sees it as a shrewd but not terribly exciting CBS procedural recasting The Equalizer in a post-9/11 surveillance package. Praises Michael Emerson's performance but notes Jim Caviezel's character is emotionally distant.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
29 June 2015 · Stefan Mohamed
80*

The critic argues that despite a shaky start with case-of-the-week episodes, the series improves dramatically and becomes one of the smartest shows on TV, particularly in exploring AI and surveillance themes. They single out the character development, inventive action, and subversion of network TV formulas for praise.

Read the full review →
/Film
22 July 2011 · festival review · Devindra Hardawar
80*

The pilot succeeds as a slick post-9/11 techno-thriller blending Batman-style vigilantism with surveillance themes, delivering strong action and promising premise.

Read the full review →
Collider
19 April 2022 · Arianne Binette
70*

The critic ranks the seasons from worst to best, highlighting season 3 as the peak for fully embracing its serialized conspiracy and sci-fi elements after strong foundational seasons, while noting season 5 felt rushed due to early cancellation. They praise the show's evolution and risks taken in later seasons.

Read the full review →
Paste
23 September 2011 · 6.5 · Ross Bonaime
50*

The critic finds the premise interesting but flawed, with a mediocre first case and generic elements typical of CBS procedurals. They single out the mystery surrounding the two main characters and the involvement of creators J.J. Abrams and Jonathan Nolan as sources of potential.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate