Critics’ reviews

The Last Kingdom (2015)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 64: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Last Kingdom

64
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
2

Most critics take to The Last Kingdom as a lively, grimy adventure that holds its own against the obvious comparison with Game of Thrones rather than copying it. Six of eight reviews are positive. The praise gathers around the battle scenes, which several find inventive and brutal, and around the cast: Emily Cox’s Brida is singled out more than once for her earthy humour and her rapport with Uhtred, and Rutger Hauer is said to steal the show. The collision of pagan and Christian cultures is noted as one of the series’ more thoughtful strands.

The two dissenters are firm rather than lukewarm. The Independent finds it less silly than Game of Thrones but also less exciting, faulting a convoluted plot and genre clichés, while The i Paper, reviewing the second series, thinks it too polished and bloodless to land the gritty impact it wants. Between those and the warmest notices there is a wide spread, though nobody sits in the middle.

The AV Club
9 October 2015 · B+ · Dennis Perkins
83

The AV Club finds the miniseries gripping and human, with a vivid, grounded portrayal of its brutal historical world. Emily Cox’s Brida stands out for her earthy humor and formidable presence.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 October 2015 · Sam Wollaston
80*

Wollaston finds the series a lively, enjoyable historical drama rather than a British imitation of Game of Thrones. He praises the inventive battle scenes and says Rutger Hauer steals the show.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 October 2015 · Brian Lowry
75*

Lowry finds the series a worthy, absorbing variation on familiar Viking-era drama. He praises its strong supporting cast and its compelling portrayal of cultures in collision.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
26 April 2020 · David Craig
70*

Craig’s available description is positive about the season’s shift into a new era. It singles out the changing state of Wessex as the season’s strength.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
9 October 2015 · Keith Uhlich
70*

The critic finds the series an engaging, enjoyable adventure with plenty of grimy action. He praises the rapport between Uhtred and Brida, which offsets the show’s macho combat focus.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
16 March 2017 · Mark Butler
35*

Butler finds the season-two opener earnest and atmospheric, but too bloodless and polished to deliver the gritty impact it seeks. He especially praises the tense ransom exchange and the show’s nuanced portrayal of religious conflict.

Read the full review →
The Independent
22 October 2015 · Sean O'Grady
30*

O’Grady finds the series less silly than Game of Thrones but also less exciting, and ultimately calls it a disappointment. He praises its earthy language, while faulting its convoluted plot and genre clichés.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
22 October 2015 · Louisa Mellor
75*

The critic calls the premiere a promising, bloody start and gives it a thumbs up. They single out the brutal battle scenes and praise the episode’s efficient setup and striking landscapes.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate