Critics’ reviews

This Is Us (2016)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 70: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of This Is Us

70
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to This Is Us, praising its intimate family stories and a cast that makes potentially cloying material convincing. The performances draw the most consistent approval, with Milo Ventimiglia, Mandy Moore, Sterling K. Brown and Chrissy Metz among those singled out. Favourable reviews also credit the dialogue and humour with keeping the sentimentality in check. For these critics, the programme’s kindness towards ordinary people gives its emotional turns enough substance to land.

The disagreement concerns how deliberately those emotions are engineered. Even positive reviews note contrivances and question whether the interconnected storytelling can sustain its appeal beyond the pilot. Variety admires several performances but finds the central twist makes the storytelling difficult to judge. The Ringer is the clear negative outlier, arguing that cheap surprises substitute for substantial characters and conflict. The spread is wide, then, despite a firmly positive majority.

IndieWire
22 November 2016 · B+
83

The review ranks fall TV shows and gives This Is Us an updated grade, noting its emotional appeal and twists as part of a broader assessment of new series.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
15 September 2016 · Daniel Fienberg
80*

The critic praises the strong performances and heart in the pilot while noting the interconnected structure and twist may not sustain long-term, calling it an engaging dramedy that will make viewers laugh and cry. The cast, particularly Milo Ventimiglia, Mandy Moore and Sterling K. Brown, carries the emotional weight effectively.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
★★★★
80

This Is Us offers an antidote to cynical TV drama with its fundamental goodness and intimate portrayal of ordinary people muddling through life. The winning cast and soft indie soundtrack help suck viewers in despite the potentially cloying premise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
7 December 2016
79*

The critic finds the US drama smartly undercuts its saccharine elements with clever dialogue and delivers sharp humour alongside emotional punches. The strong cast, especially Chrissy Metz and Chris Sullivan, carries the hokey material convincingly.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
· Sarah Carson
75*

The critic finds the series an accessible, cleverly written American family drama with an irresistible warmth and occasionally searing depth, despite some sentimentality that might grate on cynical viewers. Multiple narratives and strong performances from the cast, including Milo Ventimiglia and Mandy Moore, draw viewers in despite occasional implausibility.

Read the full review →
Vulture
20 September 2016
75*

The pilot review praises the show's sentimental family drama, well-acted performances, and surprising twist in the final minutes, while noting some contrived elements and manufactured storylines.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 September 2016 · Sonia Saraiya
55*

The critic notes the pilot is difficult to evaluate due to its focus on delivering a central twist and finds the storytelling a mix of intimate portraits and cloying sentiment that risks feeling like gimmicky manipulation. Strong performances from Sterling K. Brown, Chrissy Metz and Justin Hartley stand out amid the mawkishness.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
18 October 2016 · Alison Herman
20*

The critic finds the series dishonest smarm and empty calories, criticizing its reliance on cheap emotional twists rather than substantive characters or conflict. She singles out the pilot's "twist" that the interconnected characters are simply family members as a disingenuous marketing ploy.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate