Critics’ reviews

Trigger Point (2022)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 68: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Trigger Point

68
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics lean positive on the opening episodes, and the praise clusters in two places: the bomb disposal set pieces, which several reviews find properly stressful, and Vicky McClure, whose composed, tough-but-sensitive lead is credited with holding the show together even where the writing does not. Reviews of the premiere call it tense, slick and diverting, and more than one admits it is preposterous while conceding it is good fun. The Line of Duty connection is mentioned throughout, usually as a promise the series is expected to keep.

The reservations gather around the script and the ending. Early reviews already note predictability and a slow first half. The two finale reviews, from The i Paper and The Telegraph, are the coolest, finding the resolution rushed and implausible, with The Telegraph judging that the series lapses into self-parody after a strong start. The spread is wide, from warm to disappointed, and it tracks closely with when each review was written.

Radio Times
24 January 2022 · David Craig
81*

The critic praises the suspense-laden first episode and the bold decision to kill off a main character early, noting it fundamentally changes the series dynamic. It delivers on expectations from a Jed Mercurio-produced show.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 January 2022
76*

The critic finds the series utterly preposterous but great fun as slick entertainment, likening it to CSI: Peckham or Line of Bomb Duty. They single out the escalating bomb disposal sequences and banter between leads Vicky McClure and Adrian Lester for keeping viewers engaged despite the implausibility.

Read the full review →
The Times
23 January 2022 · ★★★☆☆ · Carol Midgley
73*

The opening episode review notes it was a drama of two halves, boring at first but improving, with enough to keep watching thanks to Vicky McClure. The critic singles out McClure's central performance and the show's position as from the makers of Line of Duty as reasons it might hold attention despite predictability.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
23 January 2022
70*

The first-episode review finds it a stress-inducing bomb squad thriller with evisceratingly tense moments and forensic bomb disposal sequences. The critic singles out the gripping, high-stakes set pieces and strong lead performance by Vicky McClure as raw material for a solid hit, while noting a need for more intrigue beyond the opener.

Read the full review →
The Independent
23 January 2022
70*

The review describes the series as derivative narrative junk food that is tasty and watchable while it lasts, thanks to tense bomb disposal scenes. The critic singles out Vicky McClure's strong screen presence in a tough-yet-sensitive professional role and the gripping jeopardy of the set pieces.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
27 February 2022 · Rachael Sigee
62*

The critic finds the finale stressful yet silly, with an implausible resolution to the clues and rushed mechanics around the villain's plot. McClure's performance elevates the clunky script and tense action set-pieces.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
27 February 2022 · ★★ · Michael Hogan
40

The finale review calls the series disappointing overall, with an over-written and under-explained script that lapsed into self-parody after a strong start. The critic singles out the rushed resolution and plot holes in the finale, noting it fizzled rather than delivering on early promise.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
23 January 2022 · Louisa Mellor
78*

The critic finds the premiere an enjoyably tense and diverting thriller with strong performances, particularly Vicky McClure as the composed lead, and effective set pieces involving bomb disposal procedures.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate