Critics’ reviews

Vikings (2013)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 71: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Vikings

71
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics find Vikings an engaging historical action series, with praise clustering around its bloody battles, Irish landscapes and production values. The combination of raiding, intrigue and character development gives the drama enough momentum to carry its rougher passages. Several reviews find that it becomes more assured as it progresses, while the performances help give the violence some human weight. Historical accuracy is not its priority, but that rarely prevents the critics from enjoying it.

Reservations centre on clumsy early storytelling, blunt dialogue and a tendency towards simplistic drama. The spread runs from warm approval to qualified appreciation, with no outright rejection. The Independent is the least persuaded, finding little subtlety but praising Travis Fimmel, the costumes and the theme tune. The Guardian finds more to consider beneath the fighting, particularly in the treatment of social customs, morality, knowledge and power.

The Hollywood Reporter
28 February 2013 · Tim Goodman
78*

The critic calls it a winning combination of action and historical drama that should attract a robust audience, praising the lush production values and how the series grows in entertainment value and interest as it progresses. Singles out the lush Irish countryside and constant battles for praise while noting some early clumsiness.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
4 March 2013 · B · Emily St. James
77

The series delivers on its title with Vikings raiding and action sequences, plus some compelling characters. It stands as a strong third in the televised epic genre behind Game of Thrones and Spartacus, proving confident and entertaining despite not being the best show on TV.

Read the full review →
Empire
11 February 2014 · William Thomas
76*

The critic finds History's first scripted drama far from staid, charting Ragnar Lothbrok's rise in a tale of scheming, slaughter and pillaging that prioritizes drama over historical accuracy. Singles out the carnage and plaited beards.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
9 August 2013
75*

The critic finds Vikings engaging and reasonably astute despite liberties taken with historical fact and hairstyles. It examines provocative ideas about social structures, customs, morality and the advancement of knowledge and power.

Read the full review →
Variety
27 February 2013 · Brian Lowry
69*

The critic describes the series as an unrelenting cheese-fest and simpleminded Game of Thrones but finds it achieves a level of atmosphere and momentum that works as a mild diversion, with plot and pacing improving. Singles out the bloody battles and moody exercise for praise while noting it is not high art and employs a cheat to keep the lead sympathetic.

Read the full review →
The Independent
2 March 2014
50*

The review notes that the series is as unsubtle as a thwack with Thor's hammer, particularly in its dialogue, but praises qualities including the Irish countryside, theme tune, costumes and Travis Fimmel's performance while critiquing the lack of subtlety and raunch.

Read the full review →
Collider
3 March 2013 · Allison Keene
75*

The critic finds the pilot engaging despite some clunkiness, praising the brutal yet soulful storytelling, strong performances, and high production values that bring Viking culture to life. The series is ultimately recommended as fun and worth watching for its mix of action, intrigue, and character development.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate