Critics’ reviews

12 Angry Men (1957)

9 reviews from 9 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 3 so far.

Back to our review of 12 Angry Men

3 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tony Sloman
100

The critic calls it a marvellous movie and instant classic that has become part of life's currency, praising Fonda's integrity and Lumet's masterly direction for finding infinite visual variety within a single claustrophobic jury room set. Few films can genuinely be called brilliant, but this is certainly one of them.

Read the full review →
Time Out
2 July 2013 · GA
80*

The critic notes the film's contrived story but praises the tense, lucid, and economical treatment, along with strong performances, especially from Fonda, Cobb, Marshall and Begley. The consistently taut, sweltering atmosphere created by the camerawork transforms it into a strangely realistic thriller.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
20 April 1957 · John McCarten
75*

The film turns a jury deliberation into an engaging drama that reveals the characters' motivations and prejudices as they shift from near-unanimous conviction toward doubt. McCarten notes Lumet's skillful handling of the confined space and commends the strong performances, especially by Fonda, Cobb, and others.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas

Sidney Lumet's debut is a masterclass in acting and direction, with Henry Fonda gradually swaying the other jurors through reasonable doubt. It stands out for its powerful dialogue, finely etched characters and beautifully worked plot despite the one-room setting.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
29 September 2002 · Roger Ebert

The film is a masterful examination of reasonable doubt and the jury system, unfolding almost entirely in one claustrophobic room as twelve men debate a murder case. Ebert praises Lumet's direction, the ensemble cast, and the way tension builds through dialogue, personality clashes, and visual choices that heighten claustrophobia.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
1 December 2011 · Glenn Heath Jr.

The review celebrates Lumet’s debut as a dynamic, thematically rich courtroom drama that turns a confined jury room into a compelling arena for exploring prejudice and justice. It singles out the director’s fluid long takes and close-ups for revealing character motivations and shifting group dynamics.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1956 · Variety Staff

The story emphasizes the responsibility of jurors and the concept of reasonable doubt as eleven men quickly vote guilty and one holdout forces reconsideration. The review highlights Lumet's effective direction in the single-room setting and states that the film leaves a tremendous impact despite some repetition in motivations.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 May 2017 · Amber Wilkinson

The review highlights the film's status as a jury room classic with strong performances and themes of prejudice. It praises the Criterion Blu-ray's restoration and extras, including the original teleplay, for enhancing appreciation of Lumet's debut.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
9 April 2012

The piece calls Lumet's debut a gripping, brilliant human drama that sets out his recurring themes of guilt, innocence, prejudice and the justice system. It praises the masterful performances, taut screenwriting and positive, earned conclusions about ideals and decency.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate