Critics’ reviews

127 Hours (2010)

21 reviews from 21 publications. Critics’ score 76: 17 positive, 1 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of 127 Hours

76
Positive
17
Mixed
1
Negative
3

Most critics respond warmly to 127 Hours, with praise clustering around James Franco’s convincing portrayal of Aron Ralston and Danny Boyle’s ability to keep a confined survival story moving. The reviews credit Franco with making Ralston compelling company, finding humour, vulnerability and resourcefulness amid the physical ordeal. Flashbacks, hallucinations, restless editing and heightened sound help turn an apparently static situation into an intense, often unexpectedly buoyant film.

The spread is wide, however, and Boyle’s style is the main dividing point. Even some favourable reviews find that the constant activity weakens the tension or crowds out the human drama. Vulture regards the visual flourishes as spectacle without enough substance, while Slant Magazine argues that they overwhelm the story, though it still praises Franco. Film Comment’s mixed assessment questions the sentimentality beneath the brutality: what most critics find moving, the dissenters tend to find forced.

Empire
13 August 2010 · Damon Wise
90*

The critic finds the film a surprisingly fun and effervescent against-the-odds drama that delivers an upbeat moral without survival-story clichés. They single out Boyle's zen-like calm in portraying Ralston's painful liberation and personal turnaround.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · festival review
90*

The critic calls the film compelling and surprisingly kinetic, noting Boyle uses every device to keep things moving in a confined space. They single out James Franco's convincing, deep performance as Ralston throughout the ordeal.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
5 November 2010 · Betsy Sharkey
90*

The review highlights the film's intense, life-affirming energy that draws viewers into the canyon with Franco's Ralston, balancing escalating tension with masterful release. Boyle and Franco succeed in making the harrowing survival story emotionally and intellectually gripping.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 January 2011 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic praises Danny Boyle's assured and tremendously crafted direction in this true survival story, along with James Franco's overwhelmingly convincing and outstanding performance. It singles out the film's visceral, poetic depiction of the central ordeal and Boyle's enormous skill in delivering an exciting, touching experience.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
5 November 2010 · Critic's Pick · A.O. Scott
90*

The critic praises Boyle for turning a confined ordeal into a kinetic, surprising film that captures the protagonist's ingenuity and resolve. James Franco's performance anchors the story, making the immobilized hero compelling company.

Read the full review →
Total Film
1 January 2011 · Kevin Harley
90*

The critic praises how the film brims with life-boosting feeling despite its grim central scene, crediting Boyle's kinetic filmmaking and illuminating of Ralston's interior life. They single out the emotional and near-mystical connections to other lives that make the story moving.

Read the full review →
Variety
5 September 2010 · festival review · Peter Debruge
90*

Boyle compresses the true story into an intense, accessible film that opens with energetic sequences and uses hallucinations and camera tricks to sustain interest during confinement. Franco delivers a credible, compelling performance that makes the audience care deeply about the outcome.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Adam Smith
80

Boyle recreates the true survival story with incredible brio, using flashbacks, hallucinations and kinetic editing to transform a static situation. James Franco gives a mesmerising performance as Ralston.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
13 September 2010 · festival review
80*

Boyle delivers a fully immersive, gruelling yet gripping experience that builds to a powerful emotional climax. James Franco's largely solo performance grounds the manic style and heightened sound/visual effects.

Read the full review →
Time Out
4 January 2011 · ★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
80

Boyle turns the grim true story of Aron Ralston into an overwhelming cinematic experience full of adrenalin and motion. The arm-cutting scene is handled horrifically and smartly.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
1 November 2010 · Paul Brunick
55*

Transforms Ralston’s story into an idiosyncratic star vehicle for James Franco; Boyle disguises his conventionally sentimental and spiritually romantic vision by way of surface-action brutality and verité affect.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
8 November 2010 · David Denby
40*

The film is seen as an existential comedy of pain and isolation that Boyle makes visually frantic to avoid boredom, framing it as a redemption tale about connection. The critic finds the approach timid and is more struck by practical lessons than the intended emotional arc.

Read the full review →
Vulture
4 November 2010
40*

The critic finds the film a flashy, music-video-style exercise in spectacle that fails to cohere into something substantial, though it succeeds as a visceral endurance test. Boyle's hyperkinetic direction and visual flourishes are singled out for complaint as undermining any deeper engagement with the story or character.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
29 October 2010 · Ed Gonzalez
30*

The critic argues that Boyle's frenetic, attention-grabbing style overwhelms and misrepresents the story, turning a harrowing real event into empty spectacle. Franco's performance is praised for conveying the character's mix of horror, absurdity, and resilience, but the director's flashy techniques are the main target of criticism.

Read the full review →
/Film
4 September 2010 · 9.5/10 · Peter Sciretta
95

The film creates strong emotional investment in Ralston despite his flaws, with Franco delivering a career-best, authentic performance full of range. Boyle's direction and the supporting craft make it a brilliant, gut-wrenching, moving experience that mixes tears, laughter, and tension.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
11 September 2010 · festival review · Kevin Jagernauth
90*

Lean, efficient, despairing, thrilling and ultimately life-affirming, the film turns Ralston's survival tale into a wide-reaching, approachable and relentlessly entertaining picture. Franco gives easily the best performance of his career as the lead transforms through shock, anger and heartbreak.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
4 November 2010
90*

The critic finds Danny Boyle's direction and James Franco's kinetic performance transform the confined survival story into an exhilarating and inspiring cinematic puzzle, aided by dynamic camerawork that avoids claustrophobia.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
5 January 2011 · ★★★★ · Ryan Lambie
80

A committed, well-made examination of individual disaster and survival with a superb, restrained performance from Franco; one of triumph over adversity despite the grim premise, though Boyle’s restless style occasionally undercuts the tension.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 October 2010 · Jeff Robson
70*

Boyle's virtuoso skill keeps the single-location story thrilling and entertaining with imagination, heart and humour, aided by Franco's fascinating central performance. The 'everything including the kitchen sink' approach leads to sensory overload that slightly detracts from the stark human drama at its core.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
4 January 2011 · ★★★½ · Jon Lyus
70

The remarkable survival story is told with invention and flair; Franco sustains the film with a great performance that mixes intense self-belief and vulnerability, while Boyle's visual virtuosity heightens both the horror and the hope.

Read the full review →
NME
17 January 2011 · ★★★½ · James McMahon
70

The single-character focus and known outcome cause the film to drag in places, but Franco is excellent; ultimately reveals itself as a celebration of life after the harrowing amputation scene, though some sequences feel clumsy.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate