Critics’ reviews

42nd Street (1933)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 84: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of 42nd Street

84
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Every one of the seven reviews is favourable, and the praise gathers in the same place: Busby Berkeley’s dance numbers, which most critics treat as the reason the film is still watched. Several credit it with setting the pattern for the backstage musical, and the 1933 notices note how far its staging had moved on from earlier Hollywood musicals. Warner Baxter’s harried director and Ruby Keeler’s understudy are singled out repeatedly, Keeler for a screen debut the critics find winning.

The reservations are mild and cluster on the plot. Time Out and The New Yorker both call the story thin or conventional, a chorus novice saving the show being no surprise, and say the dialogue, songs and visuals carry it. Empire is the least effusive, granting the film its energy without claiming much more for it. The spread is narrow and nobody dissents; the only disagreement is over how much the familiar story matters when the numbers are this good.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tony Sloman
100

This is one of the most important and enjoyable musicals ever made, a beloved early talkie and recognised masterpiece from Warner Bros. It excels through its racy dialogue, lavish production and especially Busby Berkeley's spectacular dance sequences.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 March 1933 · Mordaunt Hall
90*

The critic calls it one of the liveliest and most tuneful screen musical comedies to come out of Hollywood, a merry affair with catchy songs and imaginative staging of the show-within-the-film. Ruby Keeler makes an ingratiating screen debut, and the film reveals forward strides in the medium.

Read the full review →
Variety
90*

The review praises the authentic production that rings true in every detail, with strong performances from Warner Baxter as the neurotic showman, Ruby Keeler as the unknown who triumphs, and effective direction by Lloyd Bacon aided by Busby Berkeley's dance numbers. Everything about the musical comedy is seen as believable and well-handled.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
80*

The film revives the musical genre by setting the standard for backstage stories, relying on witty dialogue, songs and striking visuals rather than its thin plot. A strong cast delivers standout numbers while Busby Berkeley's inventive choreography stands out.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000
70*

The definitive backstage musical still has plenty of pizzazz. Warner Baxter's putting everything he can into his show when the leading lady takes a tumble, but plucky little understudy Keeler is made of the kind of stuff that can take over the role and make it her own.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
11 March 1933 · John C. Mosher
70*

The critic finds the film a bright and cheerful musical about backstage life with gay tunes and rowdy energy that expands into a pretty Broadway fantasy in its finale. The conventional plot about a chorus novice saving the show is noted, along with strong performances especially from Warner Baxter as the director.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
20 February 2011 · festival review · Chris
90*

The critic praises 42nd Street as establishing the screen musical genre through Busby Berkeley's spectacular choreography and innovative camera techniques. They highlight its upbeat take on the Depression era and its role in saving Warner Bros.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate