Critics’ reviews

A Dangerous Method (2011)

20 reviews from 20 publications. Critics’ score 66: 13 positive, 4 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of A Dangerous Method

66
Positive
13
Mixed
4
Negative
3

Most critics come down in favour, thirteen of the twenty, though the warmth is cooler than the count suggests. The praise clusters on the acting: Keira Knightley’s Sabina Spielrein is singled out again and again as bold and physically committed, with several reviews calling it her finest work, while Viggo Mortensen and Michael Fassbender are credited with making Freud and Jung feel like men rather than footnotes. Christopher Hampton’s script is admired for the quality of its talk, and a number of reviews rank the film among Cronenberg’s most mature and disciplined.

The reservations cluster around that same talk. The dissenters find the film stiff, stagy and repressed, with the Financial Times likening it to a radio drama with pictures and The Wrap calling it a prestige bore. The spread is wide, from 90 at festival to 30 on release, and the coolest notices are largely British. Even they tend to exempt Knightley, though the Los Angeles Times thinks her miscast early on.

Sight and Sound
3 September 2011 · festival review · Barbara Wurm
90*

Cronenberg’s masterly period piece uncovers the historical and philosophical backbone of modernity through the triangle of Freud, Jung and Spielrein. It offers a charming feminist touch in portraying Spielrein as the most credible figure in both bed and psychoanalysis.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
2 September 2011 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
90*

The critic praises the film as precise, lucid and thrillingly disciplined, highlighting outstanding performances by Knightley, Mortensen and Fassbender in exploring the relationship between Freud and Jung.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
1 September 2011 · Amy Taubin
85*

The critic calls the film a poignant, witty, intellectual adventure movie focused on the early years of psychoanalysis and the relationship between Freud and Jung. She singles out Keira Knightley's bold, risk-taking performance as Sabina Spielrein for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
· DJ
80*

A fascinating and fine film that dives into the minutiae of early psychoanalytic inquiry and ranks among Cronenberg’s most mature works. It earns extra marks for Knightley’s career-best performance while exploring sexual dynamics and intellectual transcendence.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
23 November 2011 · Kenneth Turan
80*

The film succeeds through smart, satisfying talk and excellent performances by Mortensen and Fassbender, who bring compelling life to Freud and Jung. Knightley is miscast in key early scenes, but the script and direction make it a strong thematic match for Cronenberg.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
2 September 2011 · festival review
70*

An elegant and absorbing chamber piece driven by thoughtful, stylish performances from Knightley, Fassbender and Mortensen. It is a cool, mannered, perfectly structured film with sublime cinematography, costumes and production design, resolutely about the mind despite its sensual core.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 October 2011 · festival review · Simon Abrams
70*

The critic highlights Cronenberg's teasing sense of humor and use of loaded gestures and images to heighten the drama, calling it his finest since Spider for its witty exploration of Freud and Jung's philosophical differences.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 February 2012 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

Cronenberg steps back from body horror to deliver an objective, historical drama about the early days of psychoanalysis and the complex relationships between Freud, Jung, and Sabina Spielrein. The film is engrossing and admirably acted, with a piercingly intelligent screenplay that explores the intertwined personal, theoretical, and sexual tensions among the characters.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 November 2011 · Critic’s Pick · A.O. Scott
70*

The film is a subtle and intellectually thrilling true story about the emergence of psychoanalysis and the struggle between unruly desires and efforts to contain them. It highlights the erotic power of ideas and the performances that restore human dimensions to Freud and Jung.

Read the full review →
The Times
10 February 2012 · Kate Muir
70*

The film is a clever period drama about the Freudian triangle, with plenty of fascination in the intellectual debates and relationships. Knightley's gutsy, intense performance as the hysterical yet brilliant Spielrein stands out as possibly her finest, though the spanking scenes may provoke laughter for some viewers.

Read the full review →
Total Film
30 January 2012 · Kevin Harley
70*

Cronenberg delivers a well-upholstered chamber drama that teases a droll dissection of mind-body divides from the source play. The talkiness may seem atypical but the elegant surface ripples with characteristic conceits.

Read the full review →
Vulture
2 December 2011
70*

The critic initially found the film wordy but on rewatch appreciates its classical restraint and Freudian humor, contrasting it favorably with more despairing films while noting strong performances and the central themes of sex and repression.

Read the full review →
Time Out
21 November 2011 · ★★★ · Dave Calhoun
60

An unusual, bloodless but effective précis of Jung and Freud’s ideas and their evolution, with strong performances from Fassbender, Mortensen and especially Knightley. It struggles with theatrical roots, stuffy historical reconstruction and affected accents.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
23 November 2011 · David Denby
55*

Cronenberg’s most polished and bourgeois film depicts the split between Freud and Jung through calm discussion of desire and repression, with strong performances from Mortensen and Fassbender. It feels thematically apt but too tame and repressed compared to the director’s earlier visceral works.

Read the full review →
Empire
5 February 2012 · William Thomas
50*

The film is a precisely made but buttoned-up and somewhat dull account of the intellectual rivalry between Freud and Jung, with too little of the expected fireworks. Knightley's intense physical performance stands out as both disquieting and brave, though the overall result feels austere and repressed.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
40*

Cronenberg's film is surprisingly plodding and inert, a talky and earnest biopic that fails to dramatise its profound ideas effectively. Knightley's star turn as the troubled Spielrein is the highlight, showing real acting range and making the film worth seeing despite its flaws.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
9 February 2012 · Nigel Andrews
30*

Cronenberg directs the story of Freud and Jung's rivalry as if he has suppressed his former self, resulting in a stiff, genteel, and well-behaved film that feels like a radio drama with pictures. Little breathes or convinces amid the period trappings and biopic dialogue, though Knightley provides a brief bright spot.

Read the full review →
Collider
22 November 2011 · B · Matt Goldberg
77

The critic finds the film a wickedly smart exploration of Freudian concepts and the clash between Jung and Freud, but notes that its heavy use of psychobabble inadvertently cuts off emotional connection to the audience.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
6 February 2012 · ★★★ · Stella Papamichael
60

The critic finds the film an intriguing but restrained Cronenberg effort that is more talk than action and ultimately not deeply moving. She praises the strong performances, especially from Mortensen and Fassbender, and the tasteful handling of the material.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
22 November 2011
30*

The critic finds the film a stagy and interminably talky prestige bore that fails to generate drama despite its historical subject matter. Technical elements like cinematography and score are singled out as strong points even when the storytelling falls short.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate