Critics’ reviews

A Fish Called Wanda (1988)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 81: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of A Fish Called Wanda

81
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics warmly recommend A Fish Called Wanda, with praise clustering around its ensemble, tightly worked farce and comedy of British-American differences. Charles Crichton’s economical direction receives particular credit for sustaining the pace while allowing awkward encounters and character clashes enough time to become funny. The performances are another point of agreement: the cast’s chemistry makes the scheming enjoyable, while Kevin Kline’s manic Otto draws particular praise for giving the film much of its personality.

The reservations concern taste and comic payoff rather than the performers, though the spread runs from outright enthusiasm to a mixed response. Slant Magazine finds some of the humour dated in its poor taste, without treating that as a decisive weakness. The New York Times is the clearest dissenter, admiring the cast’s chemistry but finding the caper less funny in execution than in anticipation, with a central joke stretched too far.

RogerEbert.com
29 July 1988 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The critic calls it the funniest movie in a long time thanks to its meanspirited take on vanity, greed and lust, with eccentric characters and flawless mid-Atlantic teamwork.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
30 August 2006 · A · Noel Murray
95

The film is a cult hit that became a personal project for Cleese, shifting from an Ealing homage to a blackly comic study of American-British differences. Crichton lets scenes play out with minimal cutting to build comic rhythm, while Kline and Palin rework dialogue in rehearsal.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Emma Cochrane
85*

The critic praises the film as a successful modern twist on Ealing comedies that became one of the most successful British comedies ever, with strong comic performances and lasting gags. They single out the fast pace from director Charles Crichton's economical style and the well-cast leads for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
15 July 1988 · Sheila Benson
80*

The critic praises the convulsively funny farce about cultural differences between Brits and Yanks, with Crichton’s masterful direction keeping the intricate plot spinning at high speed.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
12 July 2013 · Ted Pigeon
80*

The film channels Monty Python's wit with its own personality, thanks largely to Kline's manic, loveable twit performance as Otto that gives the movie its soul. Crichton's simple creative touches and sharp dialogue elevate the awkward character interactions, despite some dated poor taste.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · SGa
75*

The critic calls it a perfectly old-fashioned romantic comedy that is never dull. They single out the tightly scripted yarn and very funny gags, along with the strong character work from the ensemble.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
15 July 1988 · Vincent Canby
50*

The critic finds the anticipation of the caper-comedy better than the execution, noting it plays like an extended lampshade joke despite strong cast chemistry.

Read the full review →
The Times
24 August 2018 · ★★★★☆

It is that rare thing, a properly funny Anglo-American comedy blending Oxbridge wit with Hollywood gloss. Cleese excels as the uptight barrister, with Palin and Kline stealing scenes in their roles.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1987 · ** · Variety Staff

The review finds the film wacky and occasionally outrageous in a distinctly British way, highlighting Curtis’s comic timing and the love-hate rivalry between Brits and Yanks.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate