Critics’ reviews

A Little Princess (1995)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 86: 8 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of A Little Princess

86
Positive
8
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are unanimous in their approval, and unusually consistent about what earns it. Most critics single out Cuarón’s direction, which they credit with taking a child’s imagination seriously rather than talking down to it: the heightened fairy-tale sets, the live-action Ramayana sequences, the snow-shake moment and the rooftop escape are the details that keep recurring. Several note that the film works as well for adults as for children, and that its case for magic and dignity is made through pictures rather than speeches.

Where they part is on the source. Empire and The New York Times both record that Cuarón takes liberties with Burnett’s novel, and both approve, the latter calling it reinvention rather than embalming. Nobody registers a genuine reservation; the spread runs from admiring to rapturous, with the 1995 notices warmest and the later reappraisals from Vulture, Time Out and IndieWire a shade cooler while still calling it the best version of the story.

Variety
1 May 1995 · Todd McCarthy
95*

An astonishing work of studio artifice, the film is a rare children's movie that plays equally well to kids and adults, stressing the importance of magic and imagination in life. Cuarón's Hollywood debut is dazzling, with a riot of cinematic imagination and a visual style that fully expresses the story's themes.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
10 May 1995 · Kenneth Turan
90*

The enchanting fantasy takes the philosophy that magic has to be believed to be real and casts the type of spell most family films can only dream about. Cuarón's direction, with simplicity and restraint, creates a sense of wonder through visual and emotional means.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 May 1995 · ★★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
88

The film is a magical family story based on Frances Hodgson Burnett that treats children's imaginations with respect and places them in wondrous, detailed settings. Cuarón's direction brings precise magic realism to the sets and situations, emphasizing wonder and pluck over action.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
85*

The critic finds the adaptation beautifully made and enjoyable with true universal appeal despite liberties taken with the source material. Cuarón's magical fairy-tale direction and the performances, especially by the young cast and the headmistress, are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 May 1995 · Janet Maslin
85*

The film achieves an irresistible bright, beautiful and enchantingly childlike vision that revels in exuberant play and a wittily heightened fairy-tale reality. Cuarón takes liberties to reinvent the story rather than embalm it, resulting in a spirited and pretty delight.

Read the full review →
Vulture
14 October 2013
85*

The critic highly appreciates Cuarón's 1995 adaptation as one of his best films, praising its magical yet grounded storytelling. They single out the inventive live-action Ramayana sequences and the emotional father-daughter reunion for particular praise.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
3 August 2020 · Kate Erbland
80*

The critic calls Cuarón's film the best cinematic version of the story, commending how it richly bridges magic and reality. They highlight its enriching emotional and visual approach to the fairy tale.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · WH
80*

The critic praises Cuarón's adaptation of the Burnett novel, updated to WWI, for transforming melodramatic elements into a humanist rites-of-passage story with skill and sensitivity. They single out the audacious Bollywood-style myth sequences, Lean-like rooftop escape, magical snow-shake moment, and Sara's defiant declaration as a defence of dignity and dreams.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate